Quantcast
Channel: History
Viewing all 1838 articles
Browse latest View live

7 things you didn’t know about the First Battle of Fallujah

$
0
0

April marks the anniversary of the First Battle of Fallujah, aka Operation Vigilant Resolve, which took place in 2004. 

Led by Marine Expeditionary Force commander Lt. Gen. James Conway and 1st Marine Division commander Maj. Gen. James Mattis, the battle was started in retaliation for consecutive attacks in the region including the brutal killings of four private military contractors.

The fierce fighting lasted for a month before US forces withdrew from the city and turned over control to the Fallujah Brigade.

The battle is lesser known than Operation Phantom Fury, or the second Battle of Fallujah. But it was a key engagement during Operation Iraqi Freedom as it brought attention to several facts about the Iraq campaign that the general public was not aware of amd increased the polarization of public opinion about the war.

More than a decade later, here are seven things you didn’t know about that battle.

1. The use of Private Military Contractors (PMC’s) began to see public scrutiny.

Blackwater Iraq

On March 31st, 2004 four Blackwater security contractors were ambushed, killed, and mutilated on the outskirts of Fallujah. Before this highly publicized incident, the general public had little knowledge of private military contractors and their role in the War on Terror, specifically in Iraq.

2. It was the first time insurgents, rather than Saddam loyalists, were considered the primary enemy of Coalition Forces.

Fallujah in March Al Qaeda

Operation Vigilant Resolve brought mainstream attention to a growing insurgency comprised of fighters other than Saddam loyalists.

3. The battle thrust Abu Musab al-Zarqawi into the spotlight as the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq.

Abu_Musab_al Zarqawi_(1966 2006)

With the general public now well-aware of the growing insurgency, its leader al-Zarqawi became a notorious figure. Zarqawi’s group would largely be defeated later in the war, but it would eventually re-emerge in the Syrian war as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS).

4. It was the largest combat mission since the declaration of the end of “major hostilities.” 

bush mission accomplished

On May 1, 2003 President Bush gave a speech from the USS Abraham Lincoln in which he declared major combat operations in Iraq to be over. Although there continued to be guerrilla warfare, Operation Vigilant Resolve was the first time a major combat operation took place after that speech.

5. The battle brought public attention to the Sunni Triangle.

Sunni triangle

When the battle began the term "Sunni Triangle" became widely known since Fallujah was only one of several cities known to be Sunni strongholds, all of which were located in triangular area of a map Northwest of Baghdad.

6. Scout Snipers were the core element of the strategy.

US Sniper Fallujah

Scout snipers averaged 31 kills apiece during Operation Vigilant Resolve (one kill every 3-4 hours), according to Global Security.

7. One reconnaissance platoon set a record for Silver Stars awarded in the Global War on Terror.

1st Recon Bn Color

Four members of the second platoon of Bravo Company, First Reconnaissance Battalion, 1st Marine Division were awarded the Silver Star — a record unmatched by any other company or platoon in the Global War on Terror, according to Military Times.

In addition, Capt. Brent Morel and Sergeant Willie L. Copeland were both awarded the Navy Cross for their heroism during the battle.

SEE ALSO: ISIS executed some of its former Baathist allies in Iraq

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What the Chinese saying 'The ugly wife is a treasure at home' actually means


See how the BMW X Series has evolved over the past 16 years

$
0
0

X series family 750x500

In 1994, BMW acquired Land Rover from British Aerospace (BAe) in a deal worth £800 million.

Although, the Rover Group reported 35 percent increase in their sales eight months after the takeover, the company was in decline.

Their problems with inaccurate sales data, poor productivity and mediocre quality soon made BMW, who frantically completed the takeover in just ten days, vulnerable.

The Quandt family, which owns 46 percent of the company’s stock, started the question the deal as Land Rover began to rack up losses of more than £1 million-a-day.

Yet, the takeover proved beneficial for BMW in the long run as it helped them produce their first Sport Utility Vehicle- the E53 X5.

Unveiled at the 1999 Detroit Motor Show, the E53 X5 was a four-wheel drive vehicle, with 62 percent of the torque transmitted to the rear wheels of the car to give the familiar BMW feel of a RWD vehicle. The ride was smooth and the X5 was marketed as a Sports Activity Vehicle (SAV) by BMW since it prioritized on road manners.bmw_x5_48is_e53

BMW were contemplating to produce a luxury SUV long before the takeover of the Rover Group but the project materialized only after the acquisition.

Many components and design of the X5 were taken directly from the Land Rover L322, like the Hill Descent System, Off Road Engine Management System and the two-piece taillight. BMW were assisted by the technology and expertise of the Rover Group and its employees.

BMW managed to sell more than 25,000 models of the X5 in the United States in 2000. However, the car came under criticism. It looked sturdy and outdated and its off-roading capabilities were limited.

Hence, many wondered where did the X5 exactly fit in?

Nonetheless, unfazed by the criticism, BMW continued to work on its prized model. In 2002, a sporty model of the X5 was launched- the X5 4.6is. It had a 4.6-liter V8 petrol engine, making it the “fastest SUV on the planet”. In 2003, the X5 facelift was launched and the 4.6-liter engine was replaced by 4.8-liter N62 engine. By that time, the X5 had begun to gain popularity among the consumers. BMW were producing more than 100,000 units of the car annually and it was labeled the “Best luxury SUV” in Australia for 2001 and 2002.bmw e53 x5 dSubsequently, BMW started making plans to increase its X Series portfolio.BMW X3 E83 001

The X3, based on the 3 Series, was launched in 2003 and went on sale the following year. A compact crossover, the X3 was initially vilified for its “harsh ride, austere interior, lack of off-road capability and high price”. However, like with X5, with each passing year, BMW improved the car and the first generation X3 eventually managed to sell over 600,000 models worldwide. It was also the first SAV to feature the intelligent BMW xDrive system.

On the 15th anniversary of the BMW X5, the company stated about the xDrive in its press release: “With its extremely fast responding, electronically controlled multiple disk clutch inside the transfer case and thanks to being interlinked with the vehicle stability control system DSC, the new system, which was simultaneously introduced on the BMW X5, offered unbeatably favorable prerequisites for variable, on-demand power transmission”.

The xDrive is now optional in the X1 and the X3, while it is a standard feature of the X5 and theX6.

After the arrival of the X3, BMW started to lay more emphasis on its X models. It came up with the second-generation X5 (E70) in 2007 and the all-new X6 (E71) in 2008.BMW X5 E70 LCI 462With “enhanced spatial comfort, a luxurious ambience, even more superior drive technology” the new X5 won numerous awards. AutoBild voted it as the “Value Champions of the Year” in 2007 and 2008, while the America’s Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) termed it as the “Top Safety Pick” for two successive years. In June 2010, the one millionth X5 was rolled out from BMW’s assembly lines.BMW X6 Facelift E71 LCI Wallpaper 1920x1200 02The X6, on the other hand, became the world’s first Sports Activity Coupe (SAC). It combined the performance of an SUV with the design of a coupe. Although critics were a little skeptical about the car, it fared admirably well in areas of Middle East, India, China and Russia. As Vanja Klajaic of BMWBLOG writes, “the X6 gave the customer base a vehicle that can be used as both a performance vehicle with some off road capabilities, as a fashion statement, a luxury status symbol and a comfortable long trip vehicle as well”. The first-generation X6 went on to sell more than 250,000 models worldwide and BMW showcased the second generation at the 2014 Paris Motor Show.2015 bmw x6 images 34Moreover, looking at the success of the X6 and X5 and “inspired by the dynamic potential of BMW X Models”, the German manufacturer decided to add the duo to the range of high performance sports cars from BMW M GmbH in 2009. The cars featured an M TwinPower Turbo V8 engine delivering 555 bhp. Acceleration from 0 100km/h could be achieved in just 4.7 seconds, and the electronic top speed was of 250km/h. BMW always maintained they would never produce M variants of their SUV’s as they were too big to be sportscars. Yet, the success of the X Series made it a rather profitable proposition.2012 bmw x1 1

Meanwhile, in 2010, sales of the X1 commenced- a compact SAV, based on the 1 Series. More than 500,000 modes of the X1 have been sold and it has been appreciated for its design and driving dynamics. In many countries, it comes across as an entry level bimmer and has hence, helped BMW reach out to new customers.

Furthermore, in 2011, the second-generation X3 came up. It won the title of the “Offroader of the Year 2011” by German car magazine Off Road and the car registered an instant sales growth of 59 percent in the first quarter of 2012.

Over the past few years, BMW have continued to work extensively on their X Series. The third generation X5 (F15) went on sale last year and at the 2014 Paris Motor Show, the updated version of the X6 was unveiled. Not to forget, BMW have also added another SAC to their line-up- the X4.bmw x4 xdrive35i m sport melbourne red 8And soon enough, there will be the X7 and a smaller crossover.bmw x7 rendering2One in every four BMW sold today comes from X Series and this massive success of this segment has been owing to a remarkable journey of constant improvements.

SEE ALSO: See how BMW cars have evolved over 50 years

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A lawyer in Florida has come up with an ingenious way for drivers to evade drunken-driving checkpoints

Days before the Confederacy surrendered 150 years ago, here's how Lincoln proved that the war was really over

$
0
0

Lincoln

After more than four years of exceedingly brutal warfare, Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union troops 150 years ago today.

After retreating from the Confederate capital of Richmond, Virginia on April 2nd, 1865, Lee cut west in an attempt to join with the North Carolina Confederate.

His escape was interrupted when his army reached Appomattox on April 8th. Surrounded by Union troops, Lee surrendered to Union General Ulysses S. Grant on April 9, 1865.

A series of other Confederate leaders followed suit and the war was officially declared over on May 9, 1865. 

Even before Lee's surrender at Appomattox, it was clear that the Confederacy had been beaten. A few days earlier, Lincoln himself had visited the vacated Confederate capital and performed an act that cemented the rebellion's absolute defeat, if only symbolically: On April 4, 1865, Lincoln calmly strolled through the streets of the recently captured city and proceeded to sit at the desk of Confederate President Jefferson Davis, who had fled the city just days before.

Richmond_Civil_War_ruinsConfederate forces had evacuated their capital two days prior to Lincoln's visit. Ignoring the danger of possible assassins hiding in the city, Lincoln headed directly to Richmond to prove to the Confederates that their capital had fallen and to show that law and order would be re-established in southern cities brought back into the Union fold.

He received a hero's welcome: As soon as Lincoln landed in Richmond, mobs of "negroes and poor whites" rushed towards the president, according to accompanying Union Admiral David D. Porter. "They all wanted to shake hands with Mr. Lincoln or his coat tail or even to kneel down and kiss his boots!"

Pushing through the crush, Lincoln and his entourage made their way to the Confederate White House. The house was empty except for an elderly caretaker. 

Inside the house, Lincoln "took a seat in the reception room that also had served as the office of the Confederate president," William C. Harris writes in his biography Lincoln's Last Months.

There's little in warfare that's more humiliating than an enemy leader marching into a vanquished rival's seat of power, literally, in this case. But Lincoln was already thinking about how he could heal the deep national scar that the war had opened.

In his second inaugural address, delivered exactly one month earlier, Lincoln spoke of striving "to bind up the nation's wound," and it's unsurprising that he seemed to derive so little closure or enjoyment from the symbolic victory of sitting at the enemy president's desk. "One observer noted that as he sat down 'there was no triumph in his gesture or attitude,'" according to Harris.

Despite both the immediate and historical importance of the occasional, Lincoln didn't pose for a photograph.

Lincoln Richmond visit

Everyone on hand then drank from Davis's whiskey stash — everyone except for Lincoln, that is. Colonel William H. Cook, Lincoln's bodyguard, writes in his memoir Through Five Administrations that Davis' housekeeper greeted the Union entourage and asked if they had any needs within the house.

After Cook informed him of their thirst, the servant "produced a long, black bottle [of whiskey]. The bottle was passed around. When it came back it was empty. Every one had taken a pull except the President, who never touched anything of the sort." 

Lincoln and his group then toured Richmond before returning to the ship that had brought him to the city.

Five days later, Lee would surrender setting up a domino effect of other Confederate capitulations. In a month, the war, which lasted over 4 years and killed over 750,000 people, would officially be over.

Jefferson Davis was imprisoned for two years after the war but was covered by the 1868 general amnesty for former Confederate leaders. He died in 1889, after a post-war career that included a stint as president of a Tennessee insurance company.

Lincoln was assassinated on April 15, 1865, just 11 after sitting in Davis's chair.

SEE ALSO: The story of 21 Confederate soldiers who terrorized a small Vermont town 150 years ago

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 14 things you didn't know your iPhone headphones could do

How a champion of slavery became the Civil War’s most famous figure

$
0
0

Robert E. Lee At ArlingtonOne hundred fifty years ago, in Appomattox Court House, Virginia, Ulysses S. Grant won the Civil War.* His chief opponent, Gen. Robert E. Lee of the Confederate States, had surrendered, all but ending the rebellion that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives but freed millions more.

But this was just the beginning of Grant’s career. Three years later, after Abraham Lincoln’s assassination and the terrible tenure of Andrew Johnson, he was elected president and served two terms, leaving office as a celebrated statesman. Afterward, he would manage a bank, lose his wealth, and die from cancer, although not before penning the greatest memoir of any former president. But this isn’t the end of his story; Grant would die a second death of sorts, as opponents reduced his life to its worst qualities: His bloody tactics came to the forefront, as did his drinking and the corruption in his administration. There are few monuments to Grant, and they are mostly ignored.

How did the hero of the war become a quasi-ignominious figure, and how did the champion of Southern slavery become, if not the war’s hero, its most popular figure?

By contrast, Robert E. Lee didn’t have Grant’s long career in public life. He died in 1870, just a few years after the war. But in his short tenure as president of what’s now Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia, he became a Southern saint, never defeated, and a man who surrendered his army with honor and dignity.

civil war lee grantIn death, this part of Lee would subsume the whole person. In 1890, when ex-Confederates erected a monument to Lee in the middle of Richmond, Virginia—the old Confederate capital—he would stand as an avatar for the Old South, the symbol of a romantic age.

At present, there are Lee memorials across the South: highways, parks, monuments, and state commemorations. And in popular memory, he remains a figure of admiration, an example of duty, honor, and chivalry.

To millions of Americans, 150 years after the end of the Civil War, Lee is a role model and Grant is—despite his gifted generalship and consequential presidency—an embarrassment. What happened? How did the hero of the war become a quasi-ignominious figure, and how did the champion of Southern slavery become, if not the war’s hero, its most popular figure?

The answer begins with Reconstruction. As best as possible, President Grant was a firm leader of Reconstruction America. Faced with the titanic challenge of integrating freedmen into American politics, he attacked the problem with characteristic clarity and flexibility. He proposed civil rights legislation (and would be the last president to do so until Dwight D. Eisenhower, nearly a century later) and deployed troops to hot spots across the South, to defend black Americans from white supremacist violence.* And while there were failures—at times he was too passive in the face of white violence, too paralyzed by petty politics—there were real victories too.

After Congress passed the Enforcement Acts—criminal codes that protected blacks’ 14th and 15th Amendment rights to vote, hold office, serve on juries, and receive equal protection of laws—Grant authorized federal troops to confront the Ku Klux Klan and other groups of anti-black terrorists. Declaring them “insurgents … in rebellion against the authority of the United States,” Grant and his subordinates—most notably Attorney General Amos Ackerman and the newly formed Department of Justice—broke the Klan and restored some peace to the Republican South.

Civil War Union SoldiersIn using federal power to prosecute white supremacists and support Reconstruction governments, Grant had tied his fortunes to those of freedmen and their allies. They were grateful. Grant won re-election in 1872 with the vast backing of black voters in the South, as well as former Union soldiers in the North. Appalled by his use of force in the South, his enemies dogged him as an enemy of liberty. Indeed, for as much as scandal plagued his administration, it’s also true that many cries of corruption came from angry and aggrieved Democrats, who attacked military intervention in the South as “corrupt” and “unjust.” Opponents in the North and South reviled Grant as a “tyrant” who imposed so-called “black domination” on an innocent South.

Grant wasn’t blind to his critics, and he devoted his presidency and post-presidency to defending both his record as general and the aims of the war he won. “While I would do nothing to revive unhappy memories in the South,” he once declared, “I do not like to see our soldiers apologize for the war.”

Facing him was a phalanx of Southern sympathizers and former Confederates, from ex-president Jefferson Davis to polemical writers like Edward Pollard, who would give the name “Lost Cause” to the movement to redeem and defend the former Confederacy. Born out of grief and furthered by a generation of organizations (like United Confederate Veterans and the United Daughters of the Confederacy), proponents of the Lost Cause would wage a battle for the nation’s memory of the war.

Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant with his War Council (including George Meade & Charles A. Dana) Outside the Massaponax Church in Fredericksburg, May 21st 1864To them it was not a rebellion or a fight for slavery; it was a noble battle for constitutional ideals. As Davis put it in his two-volume memoir and defense of the Southern cause, The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government, slavery “was in no wise the cause of the conflict, but only an incident,” and the South was fighting against “unlimited, despotic power” of the federal government and its “tremendous and sweeping usurpation” of states’ rights.

Which brings us to Lee, who—in his surrender at Appomattox—gave raw materials to the Lost Cause. “After four years of arduous service marked by unsurpassed courage and fortitude, the Army of Northern Virginia has been compelled to yield to overwhelming numbers and resources,” wrote Lee in his farewell address. “You will take with you the satisfaction that proceeds from a consciousness of duty faithfully performed; and I earnestly pray that a Merciful God will extend to you His blessings and protection.”

Not only would this order help cement Lee as a Southern icon—as historian David Blight writes in Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory, Lost Cause advocates would canonize Lee as a “blameless Christian soldier, a paragon of manly virtue and duty who soared above politics”—but it would fuel other narratives: that the nation should honor Southern bravery, that the Union’s victory was one of numerical superiority and not tactical skill (it’s in this that we see the claim that Grant was a “butcher” of men, despite all evidence to the contrary), that Reconstruction was a disaster of federal overreach, and that white supremacy was the proper order of things in the United States.

"Three Confederate prisoners, Gettysburg, 1863"

And in at least the case of Southern bravery, Lost Causers would find help from Grant, who admired Lee and the soldiers he led. “I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse,” Grant wrote in an oft-quoted passage of his memoirs. “I do not question, however, the sincerity of the great mass of those who were opposed to us.”

Grant’s post-facto nod to Lee would stand as a powerful symbol of reconciliation. Blight writes, “Grant’s passing was invoked as a moment of national unity. Some Confederate veterans’ groups in the South passed resolutions of honor and sympathy for their former foe.” Two of his pallbearers were former Confederate generals—appointed by Democratic President Grover Cleveland—representatives of a nation united in mourning and eager to move on.

Exhausted by Reconstruction and the battles over black rights, white Northerners were eager to put the past behind them and reunite with their Southern cousins. The Lost Cause was a template for doing just that. White Americans didn’t want to dwell on the challenges of race and emancipation, and the South’s narrative of honor and sincerity—aggressively pushed by Confederate veterans and their supporters—allowed everyone to celebrate the individual greatness of men like Lee and Grant, even as the latter never abandoned his view that the Southern cause was slavery and that the North was right to wage the war.

robert e lee

To many, Robert E. Lee is what he’s been for almost 150 years: a decent man on the wrong side of history.

In popular culture, this sentimental picture of sectional rapprochement was spread by a cottage industry of writers and publishers; in academia, it was helped along in the early 20th century by scholars under the tutelage of historian William Archibald Dunning of Columbia University. Following his lead, a generation of writers would bring the Lost Cause and its ideas into American historiography.

To the “Dunning School,” Reconstruction was a terrible failure, a product of dangerous revolutionaries (the Radical Republicans) and an enfeebled, drunken, and corrupt President Grant. Dunning and his students justified the proto-Jim Crow “Black Codes,” and derided the entire project of the Republican Party as a dangerous experiment in “Negro rule.” “A concept that for them,” writes historian John David Smith, “signified a saturnalia of corruption and fiscal excess by black, carpetbag, and scalawag state governments and the tyranny of U.S. Army occupation forces.” Blacks were inferior, they reasoned, and unfit for any government. They praised Andrew Johnson’s lenient Reconstruction and attacked Grant’s in an effort to bury his reputation.

If the ideas of the Dunning School stuck with the public, it’s in large part because it gave white Northerners license to ignore black oppression, and white Southerners a way to justify it. “The traditional or Dunning School of Reconstruction was not just an interpretation of history. It was part of the edifice of the Jim Crow System,” said historian Eric Foner in a recent interview with The Nation. “It was an explanation for and justification of taking the right to vote away from black people on the grounds that they completely abused it during Reconstruction.”

The staff of Andrew Porter with George A. Custer reclining next to a dog, 1862It’s hard to overstate Dunning’s influence. President Woodrow Wilson—a virulent white supremacist—held to the Dunning School, as did a generation of the men and women responsible for American mythmaking. Dunning’s narrative was the basis for the novel The Clansman, later adapted into the pathbreaking film The Birth of a Nation—it has all the elements of Lost Cause mythology and history—as well as the novel Gone With the Wind and its film adaptation several decades later. And you can see vestiges of it in our continued fascination with the noble ex-Confederate, sent West in pursuit of life, revenge, or both.

There were strong challenges to this view—W.E.B. Du Bois’ Black Reconstruction in America stands as the most prominent—but this picture would hold in American life until the Civil Rights movement, when a new generation of scholars challenged the consensus and began the slow work of rehabilitation, for Reconstruction and for Grant. That work continues, exemplified in works like Foner’s Reconstruction and Douglas Egerton’s The Wars of Reconstruction, as well as Frank Scaturro’s President Grant Reconsidered and Joan Waugh’s U.S. Grant: American Hero, American Myth.

But while historians have rehabilitated Grant in academia—as a flawed president who nonetheless held a strong commitment to black rights—his standing still lags in public memory. The reverse is true of Lee. 

Whether this changes depends on where the country goes. Both men are eternally tied to Appomattox and everything it meant, from the end of the Confederate dream to the promise of emancipation. And in turn, their legacies are tied to what those things mean today, from the particular heritage celebrated by millions of white Southerners to the fight for full inclusion of black Americans to national life. Maybe, if full racial equality is in our future, Grant will rise higher as the man who helped move the country a step toward its destination, while Lee declines to the background of history. And if that isn’t our path? Then Lee might remain as an image of what we want our past to look like, and not what it was.

*Correction, April 10, 2015: This article originally misstated that Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered to Gen. Ulysses S. Grant at the courthouse in Appomattox, Virginia. He surrendered in the village Appomattox Court House, Virginia. And it also misstated that Grant was the last president to propose civil rights legislation until Lyndon Johnson. He was the last to do so until Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what happens to your brain and body when you check your phone before bed

This is what Lincoln had in his pocket when he was assassinated

$
0
0

It will be 150 years since President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C. on April 14, 1865. 

Lincoln was attending the play "Our American Cousin" in a much-needed attempt to calm his nerves after the stresses of the Civil War. Although the war would not officially end for almost another month, Lincoln was able to breathe a little easier that night knowing Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union troops just a few days earlier.

After Lincoln was assassinated, the president's coat along with whatever items he was carrying when he was shot were turned over to his son, Robert Todd. In 1937, they were handed over to the Library of Congress for preservation. 

When Lincoln was assassinated, he had two pairs of glasses, an ivory pocketknife, a handkerchief, a pocket watch fob, a lens polisher, nine newspaper clippings, a leather wallet, and a Confederate five dollar bill on him. 

The multiple pairs of glasses, according to US News, were for the president's failing vision. He needed lenses for both reading and seeing at a distance, especially while watching a play. The president also had strabismus, which prevented him from focusing both eyes on the same object at once. 

Lincoln's possession of a Confederate bill remains a mystery. Aside from the fiver, Lincoln had no other money on his body, from either the Union or the Confederacy. The bill was likely a souvenir from the president's victorious visit to the Confederate capitol of Richmond, Virginia only ten days earlier. 

Although Lincoln is now represented on the five dollar bill, he was not placed on the bill until 1914. Until then, the bill went through a series of redesigns featuring Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, and Christopher Columbus. 

You can see a brief explanation of Lincoln's artifacts from the  History Channel below: 

SEE ALSO: Days before the Confederacy surrendered 150 years ago, here's how Lincoln proved that the war was really over

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 26-year-old from Baltimore took a 35,000-mile road trip and ended up fighting in the Libyan revolution

The first Medal of Honor was awarded for this incredible raid on a Confederate steam locomotive 153 years ago

$
0
0

James AndrewsOne-hundred fifty-three years ago, a band of Union soldiers and two civilians launched an audacious raid to strike deep into Confederate territory, the success or failure of which hinged on an unconventional plan hatched by a civilian smuggler.

The April 12, 1862, Andrews’ Raid, also known as The Great Locomotive Chase, is was a wild sequence of events where the military’s first-ever Medal of Honor recipients distinguished themselves.

That spring, a Tennessee civilian named James Andrews proposed a plan to help Union Gen. Ormsby Mitchel capture Chattanooga, Tennessee, a railroad hub and valuable foothold in the South.

Little is known about the intelligent and charismatic Andrews, who worked as a music teacher, house painter, and in other odd jobs, according to HowStuffWorks’ podcast Stuff You Missed in History Class. He claimed loyalty to the North, but also profited from a smuggling operation in the South.

Andrews’ plan, for which he hoped to be paid, was to sever the vital railroad line from Atlanta to Chattanooga, thus preventing Confederate reinforcements from coming to Chattanooga’s defense.

Andrews chose one civilian and 22 volunteers from Ohio infantry regiments with experience working on trains to sneak with him into Marietta, Georgia, and hijack a Confederate train, sabotaging the rails, telegraph lines, and bridges behind them as they drove it northward to Chattanooga. There, they would link up with Mitchel’s forces advancing on the small city from the west.

Sneaking into Georgia proved difficult enough. The raiders disguised themselves in civilian clothes, knowing they could be hung as spies. They traveled south in small groups with the cover story that they were loyal Confederates traveling from the border state of Kentucky to Atlanta to enlist. The major problem with this story was the obvious fact that there were plenty of places to enlist without having to travel all the way to Atlanta.

Miraculously, all but two of the raiders made it to Marietta without blowing their cover. One unlucky pair ran into suspicious Confederate guards in Tennessee, who drafted them into Confederate service on the spot.

Ironically, they were sent to defend Chattanooga against their former comrades.

On the morning of April 12, the raiders boarded the Confederate locomotive General as it left the station headed north. But once again, their number had dwindled; two of them overslept in their hotel rooms and missed the train.

When the train stopped at present-day Kennesaw, Georgia, to allow passengers to eat and refresh themselves, the raiders made their move.

The train’s 25-year-old conductor, William Fuller, a devout Confederate, watched in horror from his breakfast table as the men separated the engine, tender, and three box cars from the rest of the train and pulled away. With no telegraph cables at this station and no horse in the vicinity, Fuller took off running in pursuit, accompanied by a foreman and engineer.

For the next several hours, Fuller kept up his pursuit, at various points commandeering a pushcar, a switching engine, two locomotives, or running on his own two feet. Andrews, for his part, told confused passengers and railroad personnel at various stations he passed that the train was carrying priority munitions for Confederate Gen. Pierre Gustave Toutan Beauregard. He also attached a red flag to his train, a signal used for an emergency or to inform passengers waiting at stations that another train was following behind.

The most crucial moment of the raid occurred when a raider asked a suspicious railroad worker for a crowbar at a station a few miles into the chase where the train stopped — and the worker simply handed it over. This was the one tool the raiders needed to sabotage the track behind them, and they presumably didn’t bring one themselves on their journey to Georgia because they didn’t want to attract attention.

On foot, Fuller eventually came upon the locomotive Texas, which was powerful enough to keep up with the General, but was facing south instead of north. Without a turntable to change its direction, Fuller resumed his chase by running the Texas in reverse. Pushing it to its 19th century limit, a whopping 60 miles per hour, Fuller blew the train’s whistle almost non-stop to warn trains ahead to use railroad sidings.

Civil War Train Chase Union Gen. Mitchel’s encroachment on Chattanooga had caused Confederate forces there to evacuate materials south from the city. That movement had delayed Andrews and his raiders at a busy railroad station, but they were forced to cooperate to maintain their cover.

Later, when Fuller and the Texas came into view of the General, the raiders decoupled the two box cars in the hopes of blocking their pursuers. But since the Texas happened to be traveling in reverse, Fuller could easily just slow down, link up with the boxcars, and keep going.

To make matters worse, the General no longer had enough time to adequately refuel, nor could it afford to stop long enough to destroy crucial bridges and railway behind it. In their haste, the raiders also left a telegraph line at one station uncut. Fuller, who had picked up a telegraph clerk earlier in the chase, dropped him off at this station to spread word of the raid. As a result, a Confederate garrison in Chattanooga sent troops southward to capture the raiders.

After seven hours and 87 miles, just 18 miles south of Chattanooga, the General ran out of fuel and the raiders scattered on foot. All were captured sooner or later and most were transported back to Atlanta on the same locomotive they had hijacked. Eight, including Andrews, were tried and hung as unlawful combatants, according to a New York Times account of the raid.

The rest were imprisoned in Atlanta, where ten of the raiders broke out in October 1862. Two were recaptured, but six found their way back to the Union by heading northward. Heading north might seem like the obvious direction, but not to the two raiders who escaped 400 miles southward along the Chattahoochee River even faster, and then paddled to Union blockade ships off the Florida coast.

The remaining six prisoners were eventually given back to the Union in a March 1863 prisoner exchange. Although the raid was a failure, both sides celebrated their respective participants as heroes.

Eventually, nearly all of the non-civilian raiders were awarded the Medal of Honor,  which Congress had just created in July 1862. One of the youngest raiders, 19-year-old Pvt. Jacob Parrott from Fairfield County, Ohio, was the first of a batch of six raiders to receive that new medal on March 25, 1863, making him the first US soldier ever to be presented with it.Jacob Parrot

Parrott’s citation reads:

“One of the 19 of 22 men (including 2 civilians) who, by direction of Gen. Mitchell (or Buell) penetrated nearly 200 miles south into enemy territory and captured a railroad train at Big Shanty, Ga., in an attempt to destroy the bridges and tracks between Chattanooga and Atlanta.”

Parrott was severely beaten during interrogation after his capture but remained silent, according to the Military Times. He was imprisoned in Atlanta until December 1862, then transferred to the Castle Thunder military prison in Richmond, Virginia, an institution infamous for its brutal treatment of prisoners under Confederate Commandant George Alexander, according to Frances Casstevens’ book about that prison. After the war, Parrott’s only son married the daughter of fellow raider Wilson Brown.

Since then, more than 3,400 American men, and one woman, have received the Medal of Honor. Many are remembered for familiar, but no less heroic, deeds like diving on a grenade or capturing an enemy flag.

But the wild action that resulted in the first Medal of Honor is truly without parallel.

Corey Adwar is a writer from Long Island with a passion for military and international relations topics. Follow Corey Adwar on Twitter @CoreyAdwar.    

SEE ALSO: This is what Lincoln had in his pocket when he was assassinated

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map of what Earth would look like if all the ice melted

The original Associated Press report of Lincoln's assassination doesn't even mention him getting shot until the third paragraph

$
0
0

John Wilkes Booth portrait

On the night of April 14, 1865, President Abraham Lincoln was shot in the back of the head by assassin John Wilkes Booth while attending a performance of the play "Our American Cousin" at Ford's Theater in Washington, DC. 

Simultaneous assassination attempts attempted by Booth's co-conspirators against Vice President Andrew Johnson and Secretary of State William H. Seward on April 14 failed, and Lincoln was the only one to succumb to the plan. 

The details of Lincoln's assassination were immediately captured and transmitted by Associated Press correspondent Lawrence Gobright. In the chaos following the shooting, Gobright reported from the White House, the streets of Washington, DC, and Ford's Theater, producing an on-the-spot news report of one of the most significant events in American history.

Remarkably, the first direct reference to Lincoln's assassination doesn't come until three paragraphs into the story. 

"The groans of Mrs. Lincoln first disclosed the fact that the President had been shot, when all present rose to their feet rushing towards the stage, many exclaiming, 'Hang him, hang him!'" Gobright wrote. "The excitement was of the wildest possible description ..." 

The crowd rushed towards the president's box as it realized Lincoln had been shot. People began crying out for stimulants to keep the wounded president breathing, but it quickly became certain that very little could be done to help him.

"On a hasty examination it was found that the President had been shot through the head above and back of the temporal bone, and that some of his brain was oozing out," Gobright noted. "He was removed to a private house opposite the theatre, and the Surgeon General of the Army and other surgeons were sent for to attend to his condition." 

Within the presidential box itself, "blood was discovered on the back of the cushioned rocking chair on which the President had been sitting; also on the partition and on the floor." Booth's single-barreled pistol was also found abandoned in the room after the shooting. 

After the shooting, Gobright reported that Lincoln "was in a state of syncope, totally insensible and breathing slowly. The blood oozed from the wound at the back of his head" while at a house outside the theater. 

Ultimately, "the surgeons exhausted every effort of medical skill, but all hope was gone."

Lincoln would ultimately die from the head wound the next day at 7:22 am on April 15. Booth himself was tracked down and killed by Union soldiers on April 26, 1865 in a barn in Virginia. 

You can read the original AP report here»

SEE ALSO: This is what Lincoln had in his pocket when he was assassinated

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 26-year-old from Baltimore took a 35,000-mile road trip and ended up fighting in the Libyan revolution

Why France's World War II defense failed so miserably

$
0
0

Maginot Line World War II France history

France suffered a notoriously quick defeat at the hands of its German neighbor in World War II.

The country capitulated just six weeks after Hitler's land invasion began on May 10, 1940.

France had a system of defense, built in the more than ten years leading up to 1939, but it failed miserably.

The problem was that Maginot Line, a great line of fortifications that spanned France's borders with several neighbors, was essentially a glorified trench.

And like any trench, it belonged to the age of the First World War, not the mechanized warfare known as blitzkrieg that Hitler brought to the Second.

The Wehrmacht simply went around the line, borrowing the low plains of Belgium to France's north.

The line's fortifications were built to various degrees. The dotted lines across from Belgium and Switzerland in this map designate "rural fortifications."

Invasion was even easier for Germany's forces because its main route, Belgium, falls within the open land of the European Plain (in the Cold War that followed, it was always imagined that the plains of Europe would host the battles of a third World War).

Maginot line

The line's failure had huge implications. In a war that would last another five years, France's role was early on reduced to one of resistance. It would not significantly contribute Germany and its allies as it had down in World War I.

Because of its place in history, the Maginot line has come to mean "a defensive barrier or strategy that inspires a false sense of security," according to Merriam-Webster.

But recent historians have suggested a revision on what the line did or did not accomplish.

The line was a failure "in the eyes of the average French person. Yet the most modern fortification system of its day actually fulfilled its mission," according to Michaël Seramour, a French author who wrote a book about the line. "It obliged the German Wehrmacht to attack through the Belgian plains again, as in 1914, and immobilized part of its forces."

In this reading, concentrating the German attack in Belgium was actually part of the plan. Moreover, though France's strategy was one of defensive over offensive development, it actually had roughly the same amount of armored tanks on the western front as its German rival (both had nearly 2,500).

French Tank world war II history

But according to analysis by West Point graduate Robert A. Doughty, "the Germans recognized the potential of massed armored forces in conducting rapid, mobile operations, [while] French armored units were committed to battle in a piecemeal fashion."

Whether the Maginot line had the intended effect or not, it did not have the hoped for result.

Join the conversation about this story »


Here's how Imperial Russia reacted to Abraham Lincoln's assassination

$
0
0

Alexander Mikhailovich Gorchakov

Abraham Lincoln was shot 150 years ago today while attending a performance of the play "Our American Cousin" at Ford's Theater in Washington, DC.

Struggling to hold onto life, Lincoln would ultimately die from a head wound at 7:22 am on April 15.

Within a day of Lincoln's death, condolences began to pour in from the major world leaders of the time. The Office of the Historian of the Department of State has digitalized and kept on record the outpouring of grief after Lincoln's death. 

One of the more amazing responses to the assassination came from Prince Alexander Mikhailovich Gorchakov, Russia's foreign minister from 1856–1882.

Following news of the assassination, Gorchakov sent his immediate condolences on behalf of Imperial Russia to both US ambassador Cassius Marcellus Clay and to Russian ambassador Eduard de Stoeckl, who later negotiated the purchase of Alaska.

According to the State Department, Gorchakov's following message to Stoeckl was sent from St. Petersburg between April 16 to 28: 

Sir: The telegraph has brought ns [sic] the news of the double crime of which the President of the United States has fallen a victim and Mr. Seward [the secretary of state] barely escaped.

The blow which has struck Mr. Lincoln, at the very moment when he seemed about to harvest the fruits of his energy and perseverance, has been deeply felt in Russia.

Because of the absence of the Emperor I am not in a position to receive and transmit to you the expression of the sentiments of his Imperial Majesty. Being acquainted, nevertheless, with those which our august master entertains toward the United States of America, it is easy for me to realize in advance the impression which the news of this odious crime will cause his Imperial Majesty to experience.

I have hastened to testify to General Clay the earnest and cordial sympathy of the imperial cabinet with the federal government.

Please to express this in the warmest terms to President Johnson, adding thereto our most sincere wishes that this new and grievous trial may not impede the onward march of the American people toward the re-establishment of the Union, and of that concord which is the source of its power and of its prosperity.

Receive, sir, the assurance of my very distinguished consideration.

The following message was sent from Gorchakov to US ambassador Clay between April 16 and 28:

Sir: Although the absence of his Majesty the Emperor makes it impossible for me to obtain and communicate to you the expression of the sentiments which my august master would have felt at the news of the foul crime to which the President of the United States has just fallen a victim, and which Mr. Seward has barely escaped, I did not wish to delay in testifying to you the lively and profound sympathy of the imperial cabinet for the federal government in this new trial which Providence had reserved for it. I have asked our minister at Washington to communicate it to the Vice-President, Mr. Johnson. Will your excellency transmit it to him, together with our sincere wishes that this abominable crime will not hinder the progress of the American nation toward the establishment of the Union and of peace, which are the pledges of its power and its prosperity?

Will your excellency be pleased to accept the assurance of my most distinguished consideration? 

h/t Miriam Elder

SEE ALSO: The original Associated Press report of Lincoln's assassination doesn't even mention him getting shot until the third paragraph

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What the Chinese saying 'The ugly wife is a treasure at home' actually means

Abraham Lincoln was assassinated 150 years ago today — here are 11 of his best quotes

$
0
0

lincoln

Abraham Lincoln kept the US united and freed black Americans from slavery.

To achieve these historic feats, he relied on a mastery of the written and spoken word. In honor of the 150th anniversary of his death, we've collected a few of his most inspiring quotes.

 

On genius



On hypocrisy



On reading



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Eerie tombs full of dozens of mummies discovered

$
0
0

Tenahaha mummy

Dozens of tombs filled with up to 40 mummies each have been discovered around a 1,200-year-old ceremonial site in Peru's Cotahuasi Valley.

So far, the archaeologists have excavated seven tombs containing at least 171 mummies from the site, now called Tenahaha.

The tombs are located on small hills surrounding the site. "The dead, likely numbering in the low thousands, towered over the living," wrote archaeologist Justin Jennings, a curator at Toronto's Royal Ontario Museum, in a chapter of the newly published book "Tenahaha and the Wari State: A View of the Middle Horizon from the Cotahuasi Valley" (University of Alabama Press, 2015).

Before rigor mortis set in, the mummies had their knees put up to the level of their shoulders and their arms folded along their chest, the researchers found. The corpses were then bound with rope and wrapped in layers of textiles.

The mummies range in age from neonate fetuses to older adults, with some of the youngest mummies (such as infants) being buried in jars. While alive the people appear to have lived in villages close to Tenahaha.

Bits and pieces of mummies

The mummified remains were in poor shape due to damage from water and rodents. Additionally, the researchers found some of the mummies were intentionally broken apart, their bones scattered and moved between the tombs. In one tomb the scientists found almost 400 isolated human remains, including teeth, hands and feet.

"Though many individuals were broken apart, others were left intact," Jennings wrote in the book. "People were moved around the tombs, but they sometimes remained bunched together, and even earth or rocks were used to separate some groups and individuals." Some grave goods were smashed apart, while others were left intact, he said.

Understanding the selective destruction of the mummies and artifacts is a challenge. "In the Andes, death is a process, it's not as if you bury someone and you're done," Jennings told Live Science in an interview.

For instance, the breakup and movement of the mummies may have helped affirm a sense of equality and community. "The breakup of the body, so anathema to many later groups in the Andes, would have been a powerful symbol of communitas (a community of equals)," wrote Jennings in the book. However, while this idea helps explain why some mummies were broken up, it doesn't explain why other mummies were left intact, Jennings added.

A changing land

Radiocarbon dates and pottery analysis indicate the site was in use between about A.D. 800 and A.D. 1000, with the Inca rebuilding part of the site at a later date.

Tenahaha, with its storerooms and open-air enclosures for feasting and tombs for burying the dead, may have helped villages in the Cotahuasi Valley deal peacefully with the challenges Peru was facing. Archaeological research indicates that the villages in the valley were largely autonomous, each likely having their own leaders.

Research also shows that between A.D. 800 and A.D. 1000 Peru was undergoing tumultuous change, with populations increasing, agriculture expanding and class differences growing, Jennings said. At sites on the coast of Peru, archaeologists have found evidence for violence, with many people suffering cranial trauma (blows to the head), Jennings said. In some areas of Peru, scientists have found pottery containing drawings of fanged teeth and human trophy skulls (skulls that could have been taken in battle) the researchers note.

At Tenahaha, however, there is little evidence for violence against humans, and pottery at the site is decorated with what looks like depictions of people smiling, or "happy faces," as archaeologists referred to them.

Tenahaha may have served as a "neutral ground" where people could meet, bury their dead and feast. As such, the site may have helped alleviate the tensions caused by the changing world where these people lived, Jennings said.

"It's a period of great change and one of the ways which humans around the world deal with that is through violence," Jennings said in the interview. "What we are suggesting is that Tenahaha was placed in part to deal with those changes, to find a way outside of violence, to deal with periods of radical cultural change."

Excavations at the site were carried out between 2004 and 2007 and involved a team of more than 30 people from Peru, Canada, Sweden and the United States.

Follow us @livescience, Facebook& Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

SEE ALSO: Ancient mummies are turning into black ooze

SEE ALSO: Archaeology has had an amazing month: Here are 7 of the most exciting discoveries

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This colorful chameleon is actually a stunning optical illusion

Julius Caesar may have suffered from a series of mini-strokes

$
0
0

julius caesar

London (AFP) - Roman emperor Julius Caesar may have suffered a series of mini-strokes, explaining his dark mood in later life, according to doctors at London's Imperial College.

Caesar, who lived from 100 to 44 BC, has long been the focus of medical debate, with the common assumption being that he suffered from epilepsy.

But medical experts from the London university have reexamined his symptoms, which included vertigo, dizziness and limb weakness, and concluded that he may have in fact suffered from a cardiovascular complaint.

"To date, possible cardiovascular explanations have always been ruled out on the grounds that until his death he was supposedly otherwise physically well during both private and stately affairs," said an excerpt of the study written by Francesco Galassi and Hutan Ashrafian.

"When re-evaluating his symptoms, it can be noted that Caesar suffered falls during his campaigns in Spain and Africa at Cordoba and Thapsus," it added. 

"He reported symptoms of headaches, vertigo and later on mentioned giddiness and insensibility, when he could not stand up as senators honoured him."

Caesar famously collapsed at the Battle of Thapsus in 46BC and had to be carried to safety.

"All of the symptoms reported in Caesar's life are compatible with him having multiple mini-strokes," Galassi told The Guardian newspaper.

The doctors, who researched ancient works including those by Roman scholar Pliny the Elder, also suggested that damage to the brain caused by the mini-strokes could have led to his changing personality and depression in later life.

Epilepsy was considered a "sacred disease" during the time of Caesar's reign, possibly influencing the diagnosis of his condition, they argued.

One of history's great military and political figures, Caesar helped Rome conquer Gaul before triggering a civil war by defying the Senate, where he was assassinated.

SEE ALSO: Here's how Imperial Russia reacted to Abraham Lincoln's assassination

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what it takes to be President Obama's right-hand man

A behind-the-scenes look at Saturday Night Live — the comedy institution created by a 'strange Canadian’

$
0
0

"Live From New York!" explores the show's early years and follows its evolution from a cult comedy show into a cultural phenomenon. Archival footage is paired with stolen moments and exclusive commentary from "SNL" legends, journalists, hosts, and crew members influenced by the comedy giant.

Video courtesy of BehindTheLine

Follow BI Video: On Facebook

Join the conversation about this story »

This incredible interactive graphic shows the second most common language in every country

$
0
0

The most spoken language in any country is pretty much a no-brainer: it's the country's official language.

A country's second most spoken language, however, is not always so obvious. And in some cases it's really surprising.

Olivet Nazarene University developed an incredible interactive graphic that lets you explore every country's second most spoken language. They pulled the data from a variety of sources, including the CIA's World Factbook.

Analyzing the second most spoken language of a country can reveal a lot about the country's or the region's history. For example, Algeria, Tanzania, and Tunisia all share French as their second most spoken language since France established earlier colonies in these countries.

You can explore other countries in the graphic below:

SEE ALSO: Why we'll never be able to change the ridiculously complicated spelling system of the English language

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This animated map shows how European languages evolved

Here's how Wall Street traded before Bloomberg terminals were everything

$
0
0

a woman at a brokerages terminal sometime in the 70s heres the description from elitetrader here is a girl working on a teletype one of the ksr series notice the two ultronics and the high speed 900 series ticker 900 characters per minute those were

Early Friday, Bloomberg LP experienced a "significant" unexplained outage of its terminals. 

With the Bloomberg terminal outage, traders were forced to pick up the phone and do it the old fashioned way. 

A Bloomberg Terminal is a must-have machine for traders. They use them to message others, obtain real-time market data, news, and stock quotes among many other functions.

Wall Street is pretty much spoiled by the incredible $20,000-per-year machine. 

Before broadband fired live quotes and analysis at the speed of light to our smartphones, traders used to read bid-ask spreads off of chalkboards and historical data off of miles of ticker tape.

We went way back to see how trading was done in the pre-Bloomberg terminal era. We even went back before ticker tape was a thing.

With the help of images from the Museum of American Finance in New York, we put together a brief, visual history of trading technology, from ticker tape to the present. 

Editor's Note: Former Business Insider writer Rob Wile contributed to the original version of this feature.

Brokers called the main trading room downtown 'The Curb Exchange.' This was before it became the American Stock Exchange.

Photo from 1915.



Much of the time, deals would be conducted out of windows to traders on curbs.



And traders were hardcore. Here they are on the Curb Exchange during a snowstorm.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

How to download a copy of your Google search history

$
0
0

Google search server

Google now allows you to download a copy of your Google search history, and it only takes a minute.

While Google has always made it possible to easily see your search history online, this is different — Google's new tool will send you a downloadable archive of your search history, which can be stored offline.

We first saw this trick over at unofficial Google blog Google System.

Now, it's important to note that your own Google account settings might be configured in such a way as to prevent Google from keeping track of your search history (some people don't like to leave a trail of their Google searches). Either way, this is a quick and easy way to check up on your Google account and see everything that Google is storing on you.

To download your Google search history archive, you'll first need to head on over to Google's Web & App Activity page.

Next, make sure you're signed in to your Google account and click on the Settings cog and select Download.

Google Search history

Since your Google search history may include sensitive information, Google displays a warning making sure you understand that you shouldn't download your search archive on a shared or public computer. It also warns you should read up on your country's information laws if you plan on traveling with a copy of your search history, as some countries could require you to leave your information when leaving the country.

Google search history

Once you've read Google's disclaimer, click Create Archive and you'll be all set.

Google will now email you a link for downloading your Google search history archive, which looks like this.

Google Search history

 

SEE ALSO: How to get the new 'Star Wars' emojis

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Jeff Bezos Slams Silly Google Perks Like Massages

Watch New York City age 500 years in 60 seconds in this time-lapse video

$
0
0

The New York Times has posted a video of what you can expect to see when you take an elevator to the observatory atop One World Trade Center — and, spoiler: it's really cool.

Animated time-lapse videos in all 5 elevators shows the development of the city's skyline from the 1500s to the present day from the exact spot where visitors are standing inside One World Trade.

This is made possible through immersive, floor to ceiling LED technology that lines the entire elevator. To travel 500 years will take about 60 seconds, which is the amount of time it takes the elevator to climb 1,250 feet to the observatory. The observatory is scheduled to open May 29, 2015.

NYCTimeLapse

NYCTimeLapse2

Here is the video from The New York Times: 

SEE ALSO: Stunning time-lapse of a total solar eclipse in the Arctic

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This wingsuit flight over New York City is an adrenaline junkie's dream

Ethan Czahor lost his job because of controversial tweets — now he's built an app that prevents others from making the same mistake

$
0
0

Clear app

Former Jeb Bush staffer Ethan Czahor knows better than anyone that you're just one bad tweet or Facebook post away from getting canned, so he's created a new app called Clear that lets people vet their own social media accounts and escape his fate.

The story goes like this: Earlier this year, Czahor was forced to resign from his new position as CTO of Jeb Bush's political action committee, Right to Rise, after reporters dug up old tweets that jokingly referred to women as "sluts" and other off-color comments about gay and black men.

Czahor claims the tweets and posts were simply bad jokes, taken out of context from a time when he was studying improv comedy at The Groundlings in Los Angeles. Regardless, Czahor quickly found himself without a job, and that's when the idea for Clear hit him.

Ethan Czahor"As soon as my situation happened, I had the idea for Clear," Czahor told Business Insider in an interview. "But I figured I would take a few weeks off and kind of let things sit and simmer down. So I did, I played a lot of video games, of course. After that, Clear still seemed like a good idea to me, so I put it together."

Czahor says he wanted to make it easier for people to vet themselves and their social media accounts, something he says he thought about doing before the scandal but never did out of laziness.

"When I first saw my name in the news, I thought ‘Jeez, I better check and make sure I’m good to go,’ because, you know, I had told jokes in the past and wanted to be in the clear on all that stuff," Czahor said. "But it’s not easy to do, and I couldn’t find the tool that would do it for you. For me to vet myself, I would have to go to Twitter or Facebook or Instagram, and just scroll down and scroll down through everything and keep reading it  — and it’s a real pain in the butt."

Czahor says by connecting to your Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram accounts, Clear scans the entirety of your social media digital footprint, flagging anything deemed inappropriate.

Clear app

The scan takes place in three stages: the first flags any posts with obviously bad words including F-bombs and the "N" word. The next stage scans for references to particular groups of peoples, checking for words like "Americans" or "Latinos." The final stage sends your post history to IBM's Watson super computer, the same computer that famously won Jeopardy, to analyze your posts for sentiment and tone.

Czahor says the current build of Clear actually tends to flag more than it needs to, but that he figured it was better to error on the side of caution than allow things to slip through the cracks.

Once the scan is complete, Clear then assigns a score based on your social media past, which you can improve by either choosing to delete or approve each flagged post. Taking action on a post automatically improves your score, but deleting does improve your post more than approving an entry.

After going through my post history, I was able to improve my score from 87.9% to 93.7%, but Czahor says the exact score isn't necessarily what's important, it's taking the time to look over everything and make a judgment call.

"The ideal score is 100%, but of course to be at 100% would mean you’ve almost never posted anything, so it’s very challenging to get a perfect score," he said.Clear app

Czahor says that he plans to add additional social networks outside of Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, in the future. "Anything with an API can be added very easily, but we want to make sure we get really good at the current three before we expand."

Czahor also says the reception for clear has been positive so far.

"We launched on Monday and our wait list is around 5,000 people right now and it’s growing pretty fast, so we’re definitely pleased with the reception."

You can download Clear for iPhone over at the App Store.

SEE ALSO: Khloe Kardashian is working on a new messaging app that helps friends plan their nights out

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We tried the app that's like Netflix for movie theaters — and it's totally worth it

There's a $10 million precious stone hidden in plain sight at Grand Central

Happy World Book Day — Here are 8 books Neil deGrasse Tyson says everyone should read

$
0
0

neil degrasse tyson planets cosmos fox

Want to know why we use fossil fuels to power our buildings and cars? How the US came to be the "leader of the free world"? How we transitioned from floating single-celled organisms to walking, talking humans?

Then you should read eight books, says Hayden Planetarium director, Cosmos narrator, StarTalk host, and author Neil deGrasse Tyson.

Each of the books on Tyson's must-read list, which he first described during a Reddit Ask-Me-Anything in 2011, contain a powerful lesson about how the world as we know it came to be.

Here are Tyson's eight selections, along with a one-liner he gave during his AMA on the importance of each book:

1. "The Bible," to learn that it's easier to be told by others what to think and believe than it is to think for yourself."

2. "The System of the World," by Isaac Newton, "to learn that the universe is a knowable place."

3. "On the Origin of Species," by Charles Darwin, "to learn that we have a kinship with all other life on Earth."

4. "Gulliver's Travels," by Jonathan Swift, "to learn, among other satirical lessons, that most of the time humans are yahoos."

5. "The Age of Reason," by Thomas Paine, "to learn that the power of rational thought is the primary source of freedom in the world."

6. "The Wealth of Nations," by Adam Smith, "to learn that capitalism is an economy of greed, a force of nature unto itself."

7. "The Art of War," by Sun Tzu, "to learn that the act of killing fellow humans can be raised to an art."

8. "The Prince," by Machiavelli, "to learn that people not in power will do all they can to acquire it, and people in power will do all they can to keep it."

Beyond these eight, Tyson has a few other must-reads on his list, he recently told The New York Times. These reads are for everyone from newborns to presidents.

To encourage a child's interest in science, for example, he recommends "On the Day You Were Born" by Debra Frasier, which explains how the forces of the Earth work together to make this planet a perfect home for all of us.

"On the day you were born," the book opens, "the Moon pulled on the ocean below, and, wave by wave, a rising tide washed the beaches clean for your footprints."

For a growing child, "The Adventures of Pinocchio" by Carlo Collodi provides the perfect example of "how not to behave," Tyson told The Times.

And when he or she reaches middle or high school, books like "One, Two, Three . . . Infinity" by George Gamow and "Mathematics and the Imagination" by James Newman and Edward Kasner can help show him or her how the world works. Both of these reads, Tyson says, helped transform the fields of math and science "into an intellectual playground."

Adults, too, can benefit spectacularly from a good read. Every American president, says Tyson, should read "Physics for Future Presidents," by Richard A. Muller. The book takes basic physics concepts and applies them to current issues from energy and climate change to terrorism.

But, he adds, "I'd like to believe that the president of the United States, the most powerful person in the world, has time to read more than one book," Tyson tells The Times.

A good reminder for us all to get reading.

UP NEXT: Neil deGrasse Tyson's 'most astounding fact about the universe' may bring you to tears

SEE ALSO: Neil deGrasse Tyson tells us why 'Star Trek' is so much better than 'Star Wars'

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 1838 articles
Browse latest View live