Quantcast
Channel: History
Viewing all 1838 articles
Browse latest View live

100 Years Ago, Enemies In The Great War Stopped Fighting To Celebrate Christmas Together

$
0
0

Christmas Truce 1914 World War I German Saxon soldiers

On Christmas Day in 1914, German, British, and French soldiers left their trenches along the western front of World War I to observe the holiday in peace.

In the midst of war, soldiers laid down their arms to sing Christmas carols, play soccer, and barter with the cigarettes and sweets they'd received in care packages from the nations they served.

The event would later be treated in numerous films, documentaries, and books — although often with rose-colored glasses.

British Army Captain Edward Hulse captured some of the now-famous halt in hostilities — which he called "the most extraordinary Christmas in the trenches you could possibly imagine"— in letters to his mother.

At 8:30 that morning, four unarmed German soldiers left their trenches to approach their British enemies, only to be intercepted by a few suspicious British soldiers. One of the Germans "started off by saying that he thought it only right to come over and wish us a happy Christmas, and trusted us implicitly to keep the truce," Hulse wrote.

Christmas Truce 1914 photoThe soldiers make small talk — "their spokesman" had left a girlfriend and a three-horsepower motorbike in England — but their interactions still fell within the context of the ongoing war. "[The Germans] praised our aeroplanes up to the skies," Hulse wrote, "and said that they hated them and could not get away from them."

The motion for peace came on German initiative. On Christmas Eve, decorated trees began to pop up from their trenches, followed by signs reading "You No Fight, We No Fight."

To various degrees across the front, German and British troops put down their weapons and fraternized. In some places, the truce was just an opportunity for each side to bury the dead strewn in no man's land, the stretch of earth between opposing trenches. In other places along the front, the fighting continued.

Overall, the truce was a heartening case study in the nature of human beings and their capacity to wage war on one another.

"By midday," the narrator of a BBC documentary on the event explains, "nearly half the British frontline army is involved in the truce," though how widespread the suspension of the war really was on December 25, 1914 remains in dispute.

Illustrated London News Christmas Truce 1914Historians explain that the Truce came during a period in the fighting when a "‘live and let live’ attitude developed in certain areas of the trench system," the BBC reports.

"So much interchange had occurred across the line by early December" that a general "issued a directive unequivocally forbidding fraternization,"writes Stanley Weintraub in Silent Night: The Story of the World War I Christmas Truce.

The general's concern was that bonding "discourages initiative in commanders, and destroys the offensive spirit in all ranks ... Friendly intercourse with the enemy, unofficial armistices and the exchange of tobacco and other comforts, however tempting and occasionally amusing they may be, are absolutely prohibited."

British German troops World War I TruceIt went on nonetheless, as the Truce itself shows. This might have been because of existing rifts between the rank and file and their leadership. Indeed, the Truce was a push by lowly privates, many of them shipped to the frontline against their will and fighting the war out of resignation rather than nationalistic fervor.

"Many on both sides focused more on trying to stay warm and dry, securing food, and avoiding death than pursuing the aims of their generals," according to The Encyclopedia of World War I's entry on the Christmas Truce.

The "dangers" of peace may not have been purely imagined for the political and military leadership that believed in the necessity of fighting the Great War. As Weintraub writes, past truces in military history did not have the same scale, duration, or "potential to become more than a temporary respite," as that of the Great War's first Christmas. It was "seemingly impossible to have happened without consequences for the outcome of the war."

But that wasn't to be. World War I would only end in 1918, leaving 16 million dead across Europe and the Middle East. Mustard gas and the machine gun would become the hallmarks of a protracted war so brutal that many expected it to be history's last major conflict, a cataclysm that would make war appear too mutually destructive to merit a place in the modern world.

Even the history of the Christmas Truce itself shows that this was a vain hope. A weak attempt at repeating the truce was made in 1915, but a tradition would not take hold due to "the high numbers of dead and hardened attitudes on both sides but also because of actions of senior commanders."

In December 1915, the British command even ordered artillery fire to mark every daylight hour, "and threats to court martial fraternizers and shoot deserters [had] put the final block on any contact," according to the BBC's documentary.

But 100 years later, the Christmas Truce remains a bright spot in an otherwise bleak conflict that ushered in many aspects of modern war.

SEE ALSO: The myths of the 1914 Christmas Truce

Join the conversation about this story »


These 21 Vintage Photos Show What Syria Was Like 50 Years Ago

$
0
0

Group in small town along road from Beirut to Damascus.

Syria has been at war for nearly four years. The most recognizable images of the country today depict bombed-out buildings, piles of rubble, and displaced citizens.

A collection of images taken fifty years earlier by Charles W. Cushman, an avid traveler and amateur photographer, are a stark contrast.

Though Syria saw a number of coups d'etat in the 1960s and in the decades before and after, Cushman's photos of downtown Damascus in 1965 paint a more mundane picture, showing families gathering, men riding donkeys, and shoppers in bustling bazaars.

These photos are being shared with permission from the Indiana University Archives.

Two years before Cushman visited Damascus, Syria's government was overthrown in a coup d'etat.



The military then overthrew the ruling Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party in 1966, the year after Cushman's visit.



But these photos show a more mundane side of the country, giving a rare glimpse into everyday life in the capital.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Winston Churchill's Family Was Worried He'd Convert To Islam

$
0
0

Winston Churchill

The woman would would one day be Winston Churchill’s sister-in-law was so worried he might convert to Islam, she wrote a letter urging he rein in his enthusiasm for the religion to which he had been exposed as a British officer serving in Sudan.

In a newly-discovered letter dated August 1907, Lady Gwendoline Bertie, who later married Churchill’s brother Jack, described what she saw as an alarming fascination with Islamic culture.

“Please don’t become converted to Islam; I have noticed in your disposition a tendency to orientalize, Pasha-like tendencies, I really have,” she wrote in the letter that was discovered by Cambridge University history research fellow Warren Dockter.

“If you come into contact with Islam your conversion might be effected with greater ease than you might have supposed, call of the blood, don’t you know what I mean, do fight against it,” she wrote in the letter that was widely reported in the British media Sunday.

But were Lady Gwendoline’s fears based in a reliable assessment of Churchill’s mindset?

“Churchill never seriously considered converting,” Dockter told The Independent. “He was more or less an atheist by this time anyway. He did however have a fascination with Islamic culture which was common among Victorians.”

That fascination was expressed in a letter to Lady Lytton in 1907 in which Churchill wrote he “wished he were” a Pasha (a high-rank in the Ottoman Empire).

He also occasionally privately dressed in Arab-style clothing along with his friend, poet Wilfrid S. Blunt.

Dockter said, “[Lady Gwendoline Bertie] would have been worried because Churchill was leaving for an African tour and she would have known Churchill had been seeing his friend, Wilfrid S. Blunt, who was a renowned Arabist, anti-imperialist and poet. Though he and Churchill were friends and dressed in Arabian dress at times for Blunt’s eccentric  parties, they rarely agreed.”

In his 1899 book, “The River War: An Account of the Reconquest of the Sudan,” he wrote, “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.”

“The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live,” Churchill wrote in 1899.

“The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith,” Churchill wrote.

Despite those earlier writings, Churchill in 1940 approved plans to build a mosque in central London and budgeted £100,000 for the project, Britain’s Telegraph reported, which he hoped would draw the support of Muslim countries for Britain’s efforts in World War II.

Join the conversation about this story »

German And British Soldiers In Afghanistan Commemorated World War I's Christmas Truce By Playing Soccer

$
0
0

One hundred years ago, German, British, and French soldiers left their trenches along the western front of World War I to observe the Christmas holiday in peace.

Servicemen and women stationed in Kabul decided to commemorate the Christmas Truce by playing some soccer — something rival soldiers did during the halt in fighting a century ago.

British troops pose for a photo before the game, which took place on a dusty field at the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) headquarters in Kabul on Dec. 24, 2014.

British Troops World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration

German troops pose for their own photo before the game, with their national flag on display.

German Troops World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration

Troops from both countries sang "Silent Night" before the game. The singing of Christmas carols was another joint activity during the 1914 truce.

Silent Night World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration Kabul

The game was likely much more organized than the improvised and crowded bouts played between the trenches during the Great War.

Troops World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration Kabul

German troops wearing shirts made for the centennial commemoration react to the on-field action.

British German Troops World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration Kabul Reaction

British supporters also knew to voice their support, unfolding the Union Jack from the bleachers.

British Supporters World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration Kabul Flag

An American soldier watches the game from the sidelines. The US had yet to get involved in the Great War in the winter of 1914.

US Soldier World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration Kabul

A helicopter in flight reminds German soldiers that this is not Europe in 1914.

Helicopter Troops World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration Kabul

The troops closed the match by posing together behind a banner with emblems, the Afghan flag, and a hashtag: #FootballRemembers.

British and German Troops World War I Christmas Truce Soccer Commemoration Kabul Banner

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's How Apple Meticulously Saved A Historic Barn On Its New Campus (AAPL)

$
0
0

Apple Campus

Apple is in the middle of building a new headquarters where HP's office park once was.

Amid that new campus will be a 100-year-old barn, the San Jose Mercury News reports.

Every aspect of Glendenning Barn, an area historical landmark, has been carefully preserved during construction.

Apple reportedly dismantled the barn and cataloged its contents so it could be rebuilt exactly as it was. Every plank and nail is accounted for.

The company has also collected additional redwood in case any part of the barn needs to be replaced.

Glendenning Barn is named for Robert Glendenning who settled in what's now Silicon Valley around 1850.

When it is reconstructed, the barn will be located near Apple's fitness center for employees.

Apple plans to use it to store landscaping equipment for the trees on site.

Although the company needs storage space, that's not the only reason it may have decided to preserve the barn.

Apple may have also saved the barn to ease tensions with Cupertino officials over the new campus, Bloomberg News reported.

Local residents told Apple they wanted the barn preserved for its historical significance in a community meeting three years ago.

SEE ALSO: Here's The Problem With Apple's iPad Strategy For Businesses

Join the conversation about this story »

The 12 Best History Books Of 2014

$
0
0

women reading outsideIf you're looking for a compelling story to start off the new year, why not opt for a true tale?

Amazon recently announced its list of the best history books of 2014, and it's filled with in-depth stories that shaped the United States, from the founding of the first west coast colony in 1810 to what really happened in Benghazi in 2012.

Go ahead — dive headfirst into the past.

1. "Killing Patton: The Strange Death of World War II's Most Audacious General" by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard: The latest addition to O'Reilly's series of books explaining famous murders explores the death of General George S. Patton, Jr, who died mysteriously shortly after World War II. O'Reilly examines the circumstances around his death, which many suspect wasn't an accident.

2. "The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution" by Walter Isaacson: What makes an entrepreneur disruptive? Where does creativity come from? Isaacson analyzes the personalities throughout history that led the digital revolution, all the way from mathematicians in the 1840s to modern standouts, such as Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. 

3. "In the Kingdom of Ice: The Grand and Terrible Polar Voyage of the USS Jeannette" by Hampton Sides: In 1879, the USS Jeanette left San Francisco headed for the unexplored North Pole with captain George Washington de Long at the helm. However, the ship quickly became trapped in ice, forcing the crew to abandon it two years in and continue their treacherous arctic journey on foot. 

4. "Rebel Yell: The Violence, Passion, and Redemption of Stonewall Jackson" by S. C. Gwynne: This book takes an in-depth look at the life and career of Stonewall Jackson, a Confederate Civil War general who is often considered one of the greatest American military figures of all time. More than just his military accomplishments, Gwynne also dives into Jackson's personal life, explaining his rise to power in the South.  

5. "Thirteen Days in September: Carter, Begin, and Sadat at Camp David" by Lawrence Wright: Wright gives a play-by-play account of the 13-day conference at Camp David between President Jimmy Carter, Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, and Eygptian president Anwar Sadat in 1978. During the meeting, the three leaders created and signed the first peace treaty in the Middle East, which is still in use today.

6. "A Spy Among Friends: Kim Philby and the Great Betrayal" by Ben Macintyre and John Le Carre: During the Cold War, Kim Philby rose to prominence in Britain as the head of counterintelligence against the Soviet Union. However, Philby was secretly working for the Soviets, transmitting everything he learned back to Moscow, a secret unbeknownst to even his closest friends.

In The Kingdom of Ice7. "Age of Ambition: Chasing Fortune, Truth, and Faith in the New China" by Evan Osnos: As the Beijing correspondent for The New Yorker, Osnos has a firsthand look at everyday life in China, including political and economic upheaval as the Communist Party struggles to stay in control. In this account, Osnos chronicles the lives of China's everyday citizens through this period of growth and stress.  

8. "Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence" by Karen Armstrong: As worldwide violence mounts and religious self-identification slows in the US, Armstrong examines the links between the two, and the effects violence has had on different faiths over time. 

9. "13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened In Benghazi" by Mitchell Zuckoff and Annex Security Team: On September 11, 2012 a team of six American security operators fought to protect the US State Department Special Mission Compound and a nearby CIA station attacked by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya. Though the attack made national headlines, details of the night were fuzzy — until now, as the team tells their story to set the record straight. 

10. "Elephant Company: The Inspiring Story of an Unlikely Hero and the Animals Who Helped Him Save Lives in World War II" by Vicki Croke: When Billy Williams moved to colonial Burma in 1920, he almost immediately forged a bond with the elephant population, treating their injuries and teaching them to interact with humans. Eventually, he trained the creatures to operate as "war elephants," carrying supplies and sneaking refugees out of Burma. 

11. "Liar, Temptress, Soldier, Spy: Four Women Undercover in the Civil War" by Karen Abbott: Abbott tells the true stories of four women who went undercover during the Civil War as spies for the Confederacy. The book also includes 39 photographs and three maps to further illustrate these women's wartime journeys. 

12. "Astoria: John Jacob Astor and Thomas Jefferson's Lost Pacific Empire: A Story of Wealth, Ambition, and Survival" by Peter Stark: In 1810 — six years after Lewis and Clark started their journey — John Jacob Astor and Thomas Jefferson set out to settle America's first colony on the west coast. Throughout their three-year journey, the explorers faced both adventure and hardship, and eventually established the path that would become the Oregon Trail. 

SEE ALSO: The 20 Most Popular Books Of The Year

Follow us! Business Insider Is On Instagram

Join the conversation about this story »

Barely Anyone Watched The Best Spy Show Of 2014

$
0
0

The Assets

From 1985 to 1987, the spy war between the US and the Soviet Union reached a bizarre fever pitch.

CIA assets inside the KGB were rounded up and executed, and no one could figure out why. A disgruntled ex-CIA agent evaded an FBI surveillance dragnet and fled to Moscow, partly by using a human-sized dummy to throw off his trackers. A US Marine guard fell for a KBG honeypot and allowed a Soviet operative into the American embassy in Moscow. To top it all off, a KBG colonel defected to the US and then re-defected to the Soviets after fleeing his CIA handler while they were eating at a French restaurant in Washington, DC's posh Georgetown neighborhood.

Events that could shift the balance of Cold War were coming hard and fast, and one man was in some way connected to all of them: Aldrich Ames, a CIA veteran currently serving a federal life sentence for espionage.

The hunt for Ames — who was perhaps the most damaging mole in the agency's history — and the events surrounding his betrayal of the United States was the subject of "The Assets," an 8-part miniseries that ran on ABC in early 2014. The show's pilot was the lowest-rated premier for a primetime drama in history. No matter: the whole thing's on Netflix Instant Watch. And if you have any interest in the Cold War, intelligence, or the darker regions of human nature the show belongs on your to-do list.

Plot-wise, "The Assets" is broadly similar to "Zero Dark Thirty." Both are about hard-charging female CIA agents fighting the agency's institutional inertia (and male-dominated hierarchy) while hunting a menacing, arrogant, and almost hopelessly concealed enemy. In "The Assets," that agent is Eastern Europe analyst Sandy Grimes, and the enemy is a suspected CIA mole responsible for exposing as many as 10 high-level assets that the KGB caught and executed in the mid-80s.

Grimes, played by Jodie Whittaker, is one of the few inside of the agency who's convinced of the mole's existence and continues hunting him even after the Soviet Union's fall. She's one of the few in the CIA bold enough to argue that the KGB was playing America's premiere intelligence agency for fools or to grasp the implications of such a breach. Her persistence pays off, but only after the mole hunt becomes a personally all-consuming side-note within the larger, mostly unseen history of the 1980s spy war.

Unlike in "Zero Dark Thirty," we actually meet the target of the hunt. "The Assets" doesn't try to soften Ames, played by Paul Rhys. He's an image of pure venality, in it for money and material advancement, though possibly driven by other, deeper motives that he's too afraid to fully confront. Maybe the most remarkable thing about "The Assets" is that it's able to make an objectively villainous figure complicated and human without using glorification as a crutch. 

Screen Shot 2014 12 30 at 3.52.53 PM

It's easy to see why "The Assets" was a ratings bust. There aren't any shootouts and few chase scenes. The tension builds through the endless drudgery of spy work: the meetings and bureaucracy, the boxes of fading documents, the slow-burning suspicions and constantly frayed nerves. In FX's "The Americans," the KGB station in Washington has a frat house vibe to it, while the Russian spies are relatable and even sort of hip. In "The Assets," the KGB offices are austere and menacing places. The men working in them them are hard and unrepentant, but oddly pathetic as well. 

"The Assets" also has none of "The Americans'" appetite for relativism either. Much of the latter show's drama comes through the way in which the value system and internal lives of the FBI agents and the KGB operatives they're hunting begin to closely resemble and even blur into each other.

In "The Assets," the CIA is imperfect and even negligent. But there's no attempt at drawing cheap equivalencies with the KGB. There's no comparing the way Ames is eventually treated with the Soviet agency's brutal and extra-legal methods for weeding out its own traitors. And there's no comparing their essential purposes, either. In "The Assets," the CIA is out to protect the American way of life against a determined enemy — even if it can fall captive to fatal stretches of dysfunction in the process.

That might explain another reason "The Assets" didn't catch on. The show is capable of exposing the sometimes appalling shortcomings of the US intelligence community while also affirming the essential virtue of its mission. After the Snowden disclosures and the CIA torture report, the public discourse has had difficulty holding both of these thoughts simultaneously.

Something as grounded as "The Assets" might have introduced more realism and cognitive dissonance than a popular audience can handle around intelligence-related matters at the moment. At the opposite end of the spectrum from "The Americans" is "Zero Dark Thirty" itself, a film whose narrative was shaped through authorized leaks and consultations with the CIA.

That's why a show like "The Assets" is so important. It uses the intrigue of the late Cold War to strike a middle ground that's vital in the present day.

SEE ALSO: 12 big geopolitical events we think will happen in 2015

Join the conversation about this story »

Apple Went To Incredible Lengths To Save This Barn (AAPL)

$
0
0

Apple's new "spaceship" campus will have a fitness center, and a century-old barn next to it.

The Glendenning Barn, a historical landmark, has been in Cupertino since way before tech companies starting calling the area Silicon Valley.

Glendenning Barn Cupertino Apple

The barn is named after Robert Glendenning, who settled in California around 1850.

Apple could've easily demolished the barn along with the rest of HP's old offices, but it didn't.

Instead, the company decided to take it apart piece by piece, cataloging every plank and nail so it could be reconstructed in a location where more people would see it.

Apple plans on using the barn to store landscaping supplies for the greenery on its campus.

SEE ALSO: Here's How Apple Meticulously Saved A Historic Barn On Its New Campus

Join the conversation about this story »


Poland Is Looking For A Submarine It Lost In World War II

$
0
0

Orzel submarine Polish World War II

Two Polish teams will search this year for the Polish submarine ORP Orzel, which disappeared in the North Sea in May 1940 during a mission with the Allies in World War II.

The two searches will be conducted by the Culture Ministry and the Maritime Museum in the Baltic port of Gdansk.

Built in the Netherlands, ORP Orzel started service in 1939, and fought German ships after Hitler's army invaded Poland Sept. 1, 1939. The vessel was held that month in Tallinn by then-neutral Estonia, but escaped.

Working with the Allies, the submarine then took part in patrol and escort missions for the British navy. On May 23, 1940, it left Rosyth, Scotland, and never returned.

Searches undertaken since 2008 have been unsuccessful.

SEE ALSO: Switzerland is finally getting around to dismantling its Cold War-era defense system

Join the conversation about this story »

The Untold Story Of One Of The Vietnam War's Bloodiest Battles

$
0
0

Howitzer crew South Vietnam invasion of Laos 1971

Lam Son 719 was one of the bloodiest battles of the Vietnam War.

In a new book, Invasion of Laos, 1971: Lam Son 719, author Robert Sander notes, “Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) 1st Corps, appears to have suffered more than 7,500 casualties, and the Communist forces approximately 13,000.”

American losses are harder to estimate. But at least 250 Americans died in support of the operation.

Particularly hard-hit were US Army helicopter crews who suffered more losses than at any similar period during the war.

Despite all this the battle remains understudied.

Sander, who was a helicopter pilot during the battle and a career army officer, was compelled to write the book to bring attention to what was one of the crucial battles of the Vietnam War: the last dry-season offensive by the ARVN. Had its commanders been more ambitious, the campaign could have helped buy South Vietnam valuable time to prepare for the impending American withdrawal.

The actual outcomes of the offensive were much more limited than even that.

Solving The "Ho Chi Minh Trail"

The operation was born out of Washington's desire to provide cover for further American withdrawals as the ARVN bought time for the South Vietnamese government. By 1971, President Richard Nixon was also facing mounting pressure to end an unpopular war.

Yet, there were strategic considerations as well. As Sander notes, the ongoing war limited America’s ability to respond to crises elsewhere: “When the Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968 and the US considered participating in a NATO-led intervention, the largest body of troops considered available from the two US Army corps stationed in Europe was a single brigade of approximately 5,000 men.”

American warplanners had long realized the importance of severing the “Ho Chi Minh Trail,” a term that referred to the supply network which stretched through Cambodia and Laos and allowed Hanoi to supply both Viet Cong forces and North Vietnames Army (NVA) units in the south. Since the days of the Kennedy administration, the Laotian town of Tchepone was a known hub in this network.

South Vietnam Laos invasion armored vehicle camoYet, despite war plans drawn up by both South Vietnam and the United States, political considerations made a raid into Laos risky. Such a move into a neutral country risked drawing Moscow or Beijing into the war. But the Nixon administration’s policies of détente and outreach to China had significantly reduced that risk.

Hanoi had long realized Tchepone's importance and defended the town well. The NVA, Sander argues, had pre-prepositioned the latest Soviet air defenses to cover a potential helicopter landing zone even before the 42-day operation began.

Indeed in the early 1970s the Soviets freely gave the North Vietnamese their latest anti-aircraft weapons just as they would eagerly arm the Egyptian Army with the latest anti-tank weapons during the October War of 1973.

US Army helicopter artillery ammunition South Vietnam LaosThe Causes Of The Mission's Failure

It wasn’t just technology which accounted for heavy American losses. Sander points to other tactical failures.

He argues more gunships should have been made available to escort air mobile operations: “The availability of helicopter gunships for the escort mission was a major limiting factor in how many different airmobile operations could be conducted simultaneously.”

Additionally, American battlefield priorities weakened the combat effectiveness of the ARVN, who relied on American air support and played into the NVA goal of ambushing American forces.

One controversial example cited by Sander involves the fate ARVN FSB 31, where American efforts to rescue the pilot of a downed F4 Phantom were made at the expense of defending the fire support base, which eventually was overrun.

The NVA, Sander argues, understood American priorities to minimize casualties and used downed air crewmen as bait to lure rescue forces into battle on the NVA’s terms.

Such tactical failures were due to a lack of understanding by officers of the changing nature of war. Though the US military had realized the battlefield potential of the helicopter during the Korean War, there was a generational gap within the officer corps:

These were officers that, for the most part, were veterans of World War II. Attempts to rectify the gap in senior officer knowledge of aviation operations included sending senior officers to a VIP version of flight school. This effort produced marginal results. While the senior officers may have mastered the elementary skills of flying, the VIP flight school could not replace experience.

The ARVN leadership was even more muddled. Sander paints a picture of General Lam, who had overall command for the ARVN offensive, as overly hesitant or even incompetent.

Sander’s notes: "[U]nits brought to the fight were use sparingly. General Lam commanded roughly 30,000 soldiers, but committed only initially 18,000 to the Laos raid. During the battle American observers were shocked he did not commit his reserves 'at a time when the enemy has obviously committed his full resources.'"

Indeed, Sander points out at least 9 ARVN division were deployed elsewhere during Lam Son 719. Why were these nine divisions idle?

Sander suggests that much of the ARVN army were in effect home-guard units whose soldiers spoke regional dialects and who had little logistical ability to operate nationally.

South Vietnam soldier French outpost Laos VietnamAn additional problem was “flower soldiers:” ARVN soldiers that existed primarily on paper or bribed officers to avoid military service. The contemporary reader cannot help but think of the state of another American-built army: the Iraqi Army of our era. A November 2014 audit of the Iraqi Army found 50,000 “ghost soldiers” on its payrolls.

Different Objectives In Washington And Saigon

Ultimately, the operation's limited success owed to political differences between the Vietnamese President Nguyen Van Thieu and President Nixon.

For Nixon, this was an operation meant to forestall a NVA offensive and to give an impetus to the Paris Peace Talks. Yet President Thieu fretted over the destruction of ARVN units he saw as his palace guard and urged General Lam to move certain elite ARVN back to Saigon as soon as possible.

Evidence is contradictory but it is likely Thieu had ordered his generals to begin to withdraw once 3,000 casualties had been reached.

Lam Son 719 was previously covered in two earlier books: Tom Marshall’s The Price of Exit and Keith Nolan’s Into Laos. Yet Sander has conducted exhaustive research in writing his account. This includes sources previously unavailable, including State Department cables that covered Vietnam from July of 1970 to January of 1972.

This book will be of interest to those interested in the history of air mobile operations, the diplomacy surrounding the end of the Vietnam, and those generally interested in what until recently was considered America’s longest war.

Joseph Hammond is a freelance journalist and former Cairo correspondent for Radio Free Europe. He has reported from Iraq, Somalia, Sri Lanka and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

SEE ALSO: It isn't clear who's actually in charge of the war against ISIS

Join the conversation about this story »

The Real Stories Behind 7 Everyday Expressions

$
0
0

Many of our everyday phrases come from Shakespeare, while others have more gruesome beginnings.

But some widely repeated phrase "origins" are folk etymologies that have been passed on by word of mouth and AOL spam emails. 

Keep reading to see seven everyday phrase origins that are complete myths according to historical linguists, from "rule of thumb" to "raining cats and dogs."

1. “Rule of thumb”  

james gillray sir francis buller judge thumbMany people believe that the phrase “rule of thumb” dates back to when a 18th century judge ruled that it was acceptable for a man to beat his wife as long as he used a stick no wider than his thumb. 

But the phrase, which today means “to do something the way it has always been done,” was already in existence by the late 1600s. It originates from the human thumb’s long history of being used to estimate measurements, from alignment to distance. 

We can thank a satirical cartoon artist named James Gillray for the confusion, who published a harsh cartoon of a judge named Sir Francis Buller in 1783. It shows Buller carrying bundles of sticks while a man beats a woman in the background with a caption that reads, “Thumbsticks — for family correction: Warranted lawful!”

Yet despite a scholarly investigation, no evidence suggests that a judge has ever said this — let alone Buller — and there are no cases in British common law that have ever held that it was legal for a man to beat his wife with a stick of any size.

It is, of course, entirely plausible that Buller may have said or joked about such a thing, and for that he certainly deserves Gillray’s derisive cartoon (as well as a good whacking himself).

2. “Paying through the nose” 

Apollinary Vasnetsov (1856-1933). Arrival of Rurik to Ladoga.The internet has a few fake etymologies for “paying through the nose,” the most gruesome of which says that Vikings used to slit conquered villagers’ noses if they could not pay their taxes. They were “paying through the nose” or paying handsomely.

This is extremely unlikely given that the idiom surfaced eight centuries after the Vikings’ raids, but if it does come from the Vikings, the origin is probably much more boring. 

The most plausible explanation given by Anatoly Liberman from the Oxford University Press blog is that when the Danes conquered Ireland, they wanted to make money off of their new subjects and imposed a tax like any other conquering ruler. This was known as a poll-tax or “nose-tax.” 

It had nothing to do with an actual nose in the same way that a “head count” does not refer to counting dismembered heads. The nose was a synecdoche for a person — the Danes wanted to tax every person in Ireland, or all of their “noses.”

Some historians disagree and argue that “paying through the nose” comes from a 1898 essay by a former sailor named Richard Edgcumbe who claimed the expression was originally used on board ships where “nose” referred to the bow of a ship:

It does not seem very difficult (at all events, for a sailor) to associate extortionate disbursements with handsome payments—such, for instance, as paying out a chain cable (through the nose), especially when the order is conveyed in such a language as this, ‘Pay out handsomely.’  At all events, I can speak on this matter from personal experience as a midshipman.  To my mind, ‘paying through the nose’ for anything has always been associated with the rattling of a ‘payed out’ chain cable, after the anchor has gripped the ground.

Whether it’s boring taxes or sailor slang that reached the mainland, it certainly has nothing to do with actually slitting noses.

3. “Pulling one’s leg” 

pickpocketsA popular fake etymology for “pulling one’s leg” claims that street thieves in London (from the Victorian or Medieval period, depending on the story teller) would trip their victims to more easily rob them. 

Another tale was that “pulling one’s leg” dates back to when people would pull on the legs of those hanged in Tyburn, England (the principal place for execution in the 1700s). While this did happen to speed the deaths, it is implausible as a source because it has nothing to do with the phrase’s current meaning and was not popular when these hangings took place.

As far as etymologists can tell, the phrase is most likely American. It was first printed in an Ohio newspaper called The Newark Daily Advocate in February of 1883. The paper treated it as a new phrase, meaning the citation is probably close to the phrase’s actual origin.

And though some etymology experts believe the phrase may have originated from “playfully tripping” someone, the actual origin remains somewhat of a mystery.

4. “Raining cats and dogs” 

norse god odin mythologyPeople claim this phrase comes from Norse mythology and the storm god Odin whose animal attendants were cats (which represented heavy rain or wind) and dogs (another symbol for wind). So when it was raining hard, Odin’s “animals” were outside. 

But Anatoly Liberman from the Oxford University Press blog summed it up best why this theory gets the basics so, so wrong:

In Norse mythology, Odin is not a storm god, his “animals” are a horse and two ravens, cats have nothing to do with either Odin or witches, and rain is not connected with any divinity. Odin presides over the Wild Hunt in late Scandinavian folklore, not mythology. The Wild Hunt, which is known in most of northern Europe, is obviously associated with stormy weather, but Odin’s following is made up of flying corpses, not of cats, dogs, or witches.

So yes Odin is associated with stormy weather, but everything else is pretty much made up.

Liberman thinks that in all likelihood, it originated from a 1592 sentence by Gabriel Harvey (and documented by the Oxford English Dictionary) that reads: “Instead of thunderboltes shooteth nothing but dogboltes or catboltes." The "dog bolts" were iron bolts to secure a door or a gate, while “cat bolts” were used to fasten together pieces of wood. In other words, they likened a heavy rainstorm to heavy metal bolts falling out of the sky. 

At some point, Liberman believes the “bolt” was dropped either as a joke or to make it easier to say, causing the phrase to make no sense today. 

5. “Saved by the bell”

Premature burial vaultIt's said this phrase dates back to a time when people were at risk of being buried alive. To keep from waking up inside a coffin (and then really dying), loved ones were buried with bell ropes so they could ring the bell if they woke up. Once someone heard them, they were dug up and thus “saved by the bell.”

And while that does match the phrase’s current meaning — saved by a last minute intervention — and even though being buried alive was a very real fear (with actual “safety coffins” designed at this time), this is not where the phrase actually comes from.

Instead, “saved by the bell” is boxing slang that became common in the late 19th century. A boxer who was about to be defeated would be saved if the bell that marked the end of a round rang out. Eventually, the phrase hit the mainstream.

6. “Dead ringer”

L'inhumation précipitée (1854) buried aliveToday, someone’s who’s a “dead ringer” for somebody else means that they look like an exact duplicate. 

But “dead ringer” is said to come from the same false source as “saved by the bell” — that people were buried with bells in case they weren’t actually dead. They were “dead ringers.”

But this could not be more wrong. Instead, “dead ringer” comes from US horse-racing when cheating owners would switch one horse with another and showcase it under a false name and pedigree in order to defraud bookies. 

The term "ringer" comes from an old slang usage of "ring," which meant to exchange or substitute something counterfeit for something real. The "dead" was added for emphasis.

Because the horses would have to look alike to be switched, the phrase evolved to mean two things that look extremely similar.

7. “Upper crust”

Breaking bread cutting breadPeople who are “upper crust” are upper class, wealthy members of society.

The phrase was said to date back to a tradition where bread was divided according to everyone's status. For instance, the burnt bottom would go to servants, the family would get the middle portion, and the honored guests would receive the top of the loaf, or its “upper crust.”

The only source that even hints at such a custom is a book called "Boke of Nuruture" dating from 1460 that says “cut the upper crust for your lord.” It's the only one that mentions anything like this, however, and since the phrase became a slang term in the 19th century, it’s unlikely this is the source.

A more likely scenario is that since the upper class was the at the top of society, using bread as a metaphor they would be considered “upper crust."

BONUS: “Bury your head in the sand"

ostrich burying head in the sandToday when you “bury your head in the sand” it means that you are willfully ignoring a problem, usually with dire consequences. 

It supposedly comes from how ostriches hide their heads in the sand when they’re attacked by predators, something observed by Roman writer Pliny the Elder.

However, Pliny had it all wrong: Ostriches don’t bury their heads when they sense danger, but run away or lie down on the ground and play dead. Historians hypothesize that Pliny either saw an ostrich lying down and its light-colored head merely blended in with the sand or he saw an ostrich eating

Either way, you can stop attributing this phrase to ostriches.

SEE ALSO: The 20 Most Fun Colleges In America

DON'T FORGET: Follow Business Insider's Life on Facebook!

Join the conversation about this story »

9 Everyday Phrases With Offensive Histories

$
0
0

sold down the river

If there's anything the last year has shown, it's that racial tension is still a reality in America.

But sometimes people use racist and offensive phrases without even realizing it.

Bigoted sentiments surround these nine terms, though in some cases their original meanings might have evolved.

1. "The itis"

More commonly known now as a "food coma," this phrase likely stems from a longer (and incredibly offensive) version — ni****itis. The condition alludes to the stereotype of laziness once associated with African-Americans.

Modern vernacular dropped the racial slur, leaving a faux-scientific diagnosis for the tired feeling after eating way too much food.

Try the technical term instead: postprandial somnolence. 

2. "Uppity"

Back in 2011, Rush Limbaugh said a NASCAR audience booed Michelle Obama because of "uppityism." Glenn Beck even defended him, saying the word was simply a synonym for "snobby."

In the late 1800s and early 1900s, however, black people were hanged for acting "uppity" or "insolent"— basically not knowing their place. A quick internet search shows the word often precedes "ni****." 

Originally, the term started within the black community, but racists adopted it pretty quickly.

3. "Gyp"

"Gyp" or "gip" most likely evolved as a shortened version of "gypsy"— an ethic group more correctly known as the Romani, now mostly in Europe. The Romani typically traveled a lot and made their money by selling goods. Business disputes naturally arose, and the masses started thinking of Romani as swindlers.

Today, "gyp" has become synonymous with cheating someone.

4. "Paddy wagons"

In modern slang, "paddy wagon" means a police car.

"Paddy" originated in the late 1700s as a shortened form of "Patrick," and then later a pejorative term for any Irishman. "Wagon" refers to a vehicle. "Paddy wagon" either stemmed from the large number of Irish police officers or the perception that rowdy, drunken Irishmen constantly ended up in the back of police cars.

5. "Hooligan"

This phrase started appearing in London newspapers around 1898. The Oxford Online Dictionary speculates it evolved from a fictional surname, "Houligan," included in popular pub songs, which other sources say might have evolved from Houlihan.

And Clarence Rook's book, "The Hooligan Nights," claims that Patrick Houlihan actually existed. He was a bouncer and a thief in Ireland.

The term has evolved into "football hooliganism," destructive behavior from European football (but really soccer) fans.

6. "Indian-giver"

Often a middle-school taunt for someone who gives a gift and promptly wants it back, "Indian-giver" originated from the phrase "Indian gift,"first used by Thomas Hutchinson in his 1765 book, "The History of the Province of Massachusetts Bay."

During interactions with Native Americans, he defined the term as a present "for which an equivalent return is expected." But he and his fellow colonists probably just misunderstood bartering. 

By the early 1900s, the phrase began to appear regularly as an idiom. 

7. "Sold down the river"

Today, if someone "sells you down the river,"  he or she betrays or cheats you. But the phrase has a much darker and more literal meaning.

During slavery in the US, masters in the North often sold their misbehaving slaves, sending them down the Mississippi River to plantations further south, where conditions were much harsher.

8. "Eenie meenie miney moe"

This phrase comes from a longer children's rhyme:

Eenie, meenie, miney, moe / Catch a tiger by the toe / If he hollers let him go / Eenie, meenie miney, moe

The rhyme has many versions, one of the oldest being where n***er replaces tiger. Rudyard Kipling mentions it as a "counting-out song" (basically a way for kids to eliminate candidates for being "It" in hide-and-seek) in "Land And Sea Tales For Scouts And Guides."

While the rhyme didn't necessarily originate with a racial slur, it became one of the most popular versions in the early 1900s, especially in the UK, according to the "Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes."

Bonus: "Rule of thumb"

A lot of people wrongly think the phrase "rule of thumb" references an old statute allowing men to beat their wives with a stick no wider than their thumbs. 

For example, The Telegraph reported just this year that judge Sir Francis Buller ruled in 1886 that "a man was entitled to beat his wife with a stick provided it was no thicker than his thumb." That ruling created the popular, and sexist, idiom, according to the Telegraph.

But way back in 1998, wordsmith William Safire told a different story in The New York Times. He cites "rule of thumb" as early as 1692 and then again, as an established proverb in 1721.

Buller did, however, make the ruling later in history. Someone should have knocked some sense into him — preferably with a stick much wider than a thumb.

SEE ALSO: 11 Everyday Phrases You Might Be Saying Incorrectly

Join the conversation about this story »

This Comma Cost America About $40 Million

$
0
0

fruit

Way back in 1872, a comma replaced a hyphen in a significant government document, and the mistake ended up costing the US a huge sum of money.

The error occurred in a tariff act passed that same year. 

Tariffs — fees imposed on imported goods — are one of the oldest kinds of taxes in the US. The government used to support a substantial portion of its budget through them.

The first was enacted as part of the Tariff Act of 1789.

Years passed, the North and South warred, and the government wrote up a few other tax laws. Finally on June 6, 1872, President Ulysses S. Grant's administration issued the 13th tariff act, which included a "free list"— items exempt from taxation upon entry to the US.

The free list included "fruit, plants tropical and semi-tropical for the purpose of propagation or cultivation," according to a New York Times report from 1934. 

Tariff Act of 1872

A previous act from 1870, however, placed a 20% tax on oranges, lemons, pineapples, and grapes and a 10% tax on limes, bananas, plantains, shaddocks (also known as a pomelos), mangoes, and coconuts.

Technically, the act of 1872 didn't repeal the act of 1870. But some importers claimed the word "fruit," since separated by a comma, indicated the free entry of all tropical or semi-tropical fruits and plants. Grammatically, they weren't wrong. 

Initially, the Secretary of the Treasury, then William Richardson, said the comma was intended to be a hyphen, making the line "fruit-plants tropical and semi-tropical." The hyphen makes "fruit-plants" a compound noun. The tax stayed.

Soon, importers began suing over Richardson's decision to tax tropical and semi-tropical fruits, as Priceonomics recently noted.

As a result, in December 1874, Richardson changed his mind, making all fruit free to import. He even started issuing refunds — to the tune of about $2 million or $40 million, adjusted for inflation.  

Naturally, the government doesn't like giving its money back, and Congress launched a huge investigation. As it turns out, the comma was, indeed, supposed to be a hyphen. The copying clerk made a typo. 

Although unable to renege on the fees already returned to importers, Congress passed a law on May 9, 1874 ("An act in relation to the customs duties on imported fruits") explaining the issue, and all subsequent acts contained the hyphen. 

tariff act of 1890

Considering $2 million was nearly 1.3% of America's total profit from tariffs, Congress was, rightly, pretty peeved. It then also passed laws prohibiting the Secretary of Treasury from "reversing himself," unless approved by the attorney general or the court system, according to the Times.

SEE ALSO: How A Comma Gave Americans The Right To Own Guns

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's Why Marriage Is Harder Than Ever

$
0
0

the notebook ryan gosling rachel mcadams

Marriage has always been a gamble, but the modern game is harder — with higher stakes than ever before.

Struggling marriages make people more unhappy today than in the past, while healthy marriages have some of the happiest couples in history, according to a comprehensive analysis published in 2007 regarding marital quality and personal well-being.

When Eli Finkel sought to understand why marriage is more extreme at both ends today than in the past, he discovered something intriguing yet discouraging: Marriages in the US are more challenging today than at any other time in our country's history.

Finkel is a professor of social psychology at Northwestern University and is known for developing a surprisingly simple marriage-saving procedure, which takes 21 minutes a year. (The procedure involves three seven-minute online writing sessions, where couples describe their most recent disagreement from the perspective of a hypothetical neutral bystander — something they are also encouraged to try out in future arguments.)

Finkel, together with his colleagues of the Relationships and Motivation LAB at Northwestern, have gone on to publish several papers on what they call "the suffocation model of marriage in America."

In their latest paper on this front, they explain why — compared to previous generations — some of the defining qualities of today's marriages make it harder for couples to cultivate a flourishing relationship. The simple answer is that people today expect more out of their marriage. If these higher expectations are not met, it can suffocate a marriage to the point of destroying it.

couples

Finkel, in an Opinion article in The New York Times summarizing their latest paper on this model, discusses the three distinct models of marriage that relationship psychologists refer to:

  • institutional marriage (from the nation's founding until 1850)
  • companionate marriage (from 1851 to 1965)
  • self-expressive marriage (from 1965 onward)

Before 1850, people were hardly walking down the aisle for love. In fact, American couples at this time, who wed for food production, shelter, and protection from violence, were satisfied if they felt an emotional connection with their spouse, Finkel wrote. (Of course, old-fashioned, peaceful-seeming marriages may have been especially problematic for women, and there were an "array of cruelties that this kind of marriage could entail,"Rebecca Onion wrote recently in Aeon.)

Those norms changed quickly when an increasing number of people left the farm to live and work in the city for higher pay and fewer hours. With the luxury of more free time, Americans focused on what they wanted in a lifelong partner, namely companionship and love. But the counter-cultural attitude of the 1960s led Americans to think of marriage as an option instead of an essential step in life.

This leads us to today's model, self-expressive marriage, wherein the average modern, married American is looking not only for love from their spouse but for a sense of personal fulfillment. Finkel writes that this era's marriage ideal can be expressed in the simple quote "You make me want to be a better man," from James L. Brooks' 1997 film "As Good as It Gets."

as good as it gets jack nicholson with puppy

These changes to marital expectations have been a mixed bag, Finkel argues.

"As Americans have increasingly looked to their marriage to help them meet idiosyncratic, self-expressive needs, the proportion of marriages that fall short of their expectations has grown, which has increased rates of marital dissatisfaction,"Finkel's team writes, in their latest paper. On the other hand, "those marriages that succeed in meeting these needs are particularly fulfilling, more so than the best marriages in earlier eras."

The key to a successful, flourishing marriage? Finkel and his colleagues describe three general options:

  • Don't look to your marriage alone for personal fulfillment. In addition to your spouse, use all resources available to you including friends, hobbies, and work.
  • If you want a lot from your marriage, then you have to give a lot, meaning that in order to meet their high expectations, couples must invest more time and psychological resources into their marriage.
  • And if neither of those options sound good, perhaps it's time to ask less of the marriage and adjust high expectations for personal fulfillment and self discovery.

wedding couple first dance bride groomOther researchers, like sociologist Jeffrey Dew, support the notion that time is a crucial factor in sustaining a successful marriage.

Dew, who is a professor at the University of Virginia, found that Americans in 1975 spent, on average, 35 hours a week alone with their spouse while couples in 2003 spent 26 hours together. Child-rearing couples in 1975 spent 13 hours a week together, alone, compared to couples in 2003 who spent 9 hours a week together. The divorce rate in America was 32.8% in 1970 and rose to 49.1% by 2000.

While that doesn't necessarily mean less time together led to divorce or that the people who stayed together were happy, Finkel's research suggests that higher expectations and less investment in the relationship may be a toxic brew.

Marriage has become as tricky but also as potentially rewarding as climbing Mt. Everest: Obtaining a sense of personal fulfillment from your partner is as hard as achieving the summit. This is both good and bad because it means that you are reaching for the pinnacle of what marriage has to offer — which explains why couples in healthy marriages are happier now than in the past — but it also means that meeting those expectations and feeling satisfied in marriage is harder than ever.

"The good news is that our marriages can flourish today like never before," Finkel writes for The New York Times. "They just can't do it on their own."

SEE ALSO: Scientists Have Discovered How Common Different Sexual Fantasies Are

CHECK OUT: 5 Ways To Tell If Someone Is Cheating On You

Join the conversation about this story »

See How Men's Style Has Evolved Over 100 Years

$
0
0

History in Men's Style

We’ve said it time and time again, menswear is ruled by history and tradition. Every person in menswear (designer, stylist, editor, etc) has taken inspiration from the past at one time or another. And no era has been overlooked.

Therefore, as we continue to explore the foundations of personal style via our Menswear 101 articles, I thought we’d take a quick look back at the last hundred-or-so years in men’s fashion. Perhaps this will provide a little insight or context as to how menswear shifts, and more importantly, how we can make informed decisions when it comes to buying clothing and developing personal style.

Late 1800s: Last of the VictoriansHistory in Men's Style

As the nineteenth century came to an end men were slowly shaking-off the Victorian influence which still had them wearing top hats, frock coats, and pocket watches while carrying walking sticks. This may seem like an elaborate and restrictive way to dress, but it was a big step in the right direction considering the Georgian period that proceeded it had men wearing feathers, panty hose, and high heels. And you thought you were a “dandy”.

1900s: Tall, Long & LeanHistory in Men's Style

As we moved into the 1900s men’s clothing was predominantly utilitarian and rather unimaginative. The long, lean, and athletic silhouette of the late 1890s persisted, and tall, stiff collars characterize the period. 

Three-piece suits consisting of a sack coat with matching waistcoat and trousers were worn, as were matching coat and waistcoat with contrasting trousers, or matching coat and trousers with contrasting waistcoat. Sounds familiar, right? Trousers were shorter than before, often had “turn-ups” or “cuffs“, and were creased front and back using the newly-invented trouser press. 

1920: Broadening Horizons History in Men's Style

After the war (which introduced numerous classic menswear designs which are still used today, like trench coats and cargos), business started to pick-up and Americans had more money. More money allowed them to travel more and broaden their horizons culturally and aesthetically. Many crossed the Atlantic to England and France. Naturally they returned with suitcases full of the latest fashions being worn overseas.

Of all the countries, England had the most influence on American menswear. In the 1920s American college students began putting their own spin on pieces being worn at the legendary Oxford University, including button-down shirts, natural-shouldered jackets, regimental ties, and colorful argyle socks. Furthermore, the Prince of Wales, who later became the Duke of Windsor, was the world’s most important and influential menswear figure. Through newsreels, newspapers, and magazines the elegant Prince became the first international “style icon” and became widely known and renowned for his impeccable taste in clothing. He was a legitimate trendsetter for every day people and it was the first time in history that clothing advertisers would use a celebrity face to sell clothing, shamelessly plugging their items “as worn by the Prince”.

1930s: The Height Of Elegance History in Men's Style

The beginning of the 1930s saw the great depression. Although the average man couldn’t afford to partake in the world of fashion, many often enjoyed observing the style choices of those who could. Hollywood films on the Silver Screen became a beacon for hope for the working class man living in this era. Men and women alike looked with admiration and aspiration to elegantly dressed stars like Fred Astaire, Clark Gabel, Cary Grant, and Gary Cooper.

In the 1930s the American taste level was at its peak, rivaling that of any European country. It was a time when American men took pride in the clothing they wore and the image they projected. It was a time when men dressed by certain codes of conduct and etiquette. The “menswear rules”, which we often reference, were written in this period.

“For the first time American men realized that clothing should not be worn to hide the natural lines of the body, but, rather, to conform to them, thereby enhancing he male physique. At the same time, clothes should not be too obvious. Instead, they had to become part of the man who was wearing them. The idea of clothing was not to set the man apart (as had been the case for centuries, when kings and noblemen dressed primarily to accomplish just that) but to allow him to be an individual among individuals…. Americans had finally learned that the goal of good clothing was to flatter rather than be conspicuous.” – Alan Flusser

1940s: The Birth Of Ready-To-WearHistory in Men's Style

With the end of World War II, American men strayed from the high standards and basic principles of fine dress established in the thirties. Part of this was changes in the workforce and the loss of formality in everyday life. With lower demand, the price of custom tailoring rose, which allowed for the mass production of menswear to takeover as the everyday norm. This period saw the introduction of mass produced ready-to-wear clothing in America, by some brands that are still selling us clothing today.

There were positives and negatives to these new methods of mass production. On the one hand, basic clothing was cheaper and more accessible than ever. On the other hand, there was less variety in the styles being offered, and, much worse, these major clothing manufacturers realized (just like the automobile manufacturers) that they could stimulate sales by offering changes in styles every year, or even every season. This began the “trend cycle” in retail, which was created by clothing manufacturers to make more money and propagated by the magazine industry, also to make more money. 

Ultimately this marketing strategy pushed the consumer further and further away from the “ideals of classical dress” established in the 1930s, which were all about choosing long-term pieces that best flatter the body. Instead the goal of clothiers became to confuse and pressure the consumer to continually “re-invent himself” by purchasing “new styles” that are “in fashion”. More sales, regardless of the longevity or aesthetic of the look.

1950s: The Age Of Conformity History in Men's Style

The 1950s was the Age of Conformity. Young men returning from the military were anxious to fit right in with the establishment. Fitting in and “looking the part” meant taking on the Ivy League look, which was dominating menswear. Individuality in style of clothing was an afterthought. The goal was to look “part of the club”, in a boxy sack suit, oxford shirt, rep tie, and loafers. This was another big boost for mass Ready-to-Wear manufacturers who gladly sold the same ill-fitting tweed jackets to any young man trying to look smart and employable.

Furthermore, the 1950s saw the introduction of man-made fabrics like rayon and nylon. This was another boost to the bottom line for the clothing manufacturers who could now save significantly on the cost of fabric, while producing a garment that was thought to be “more durable and easiest to wash”. As it turns out, synthetic cloth makes for terrible menswear garments, especially in suiting. Natural fibers are always better. 

Aesthetically the period was dominated by conservative grey suits and minimalist accessories (hat, pocket square, cigarette, and martini) for just about everyone.

1960s: Rebellion & Individuality History in Men's Style

The 1960s were a decade of unrest and rebellion against the establishment and the conservatism that was celebrated in the 1950s. Clothing reflected this new attitude, especially with the youth who were more concerned with self-expression and individuality than classical dressing by the “rulebook”. The clothing industry caught on to this new wave with the youth, and offered a plethora of styles. Stores carried more variety than ever. It was approaching an “anything goes” period, where often the thing that mattered the most was not what you wore, but what you didn’t wear. 

The was also the first time that fathers began looking to their sons for advice. The first time in history that grown men wanted to look young and care-free. This trend, of course, only took us further away from the rules of elegance that were established in the 1930s.

1970s: Disco Funk History in Men's Style

The early 1970s were a continuation of late 1960s hippie rebel fashion. For men this particularly meant bell bottom jeans, tie dye shirts, and military surplus clothing. The most popular accessories of the early 1970s for men were homemade, with necklaces, headbands, and bracelets being made from all-natural materials such as wood, hemp, and leather. 

Men began to wear stylish three-piece suits (which became available in a bewildering variety of colors) which were characterized by wide lapels, wide legged or flared trousers, and high-rise waistcoats. Neckties became wider and bolder, and shirt collars became long and pointed as the “disco funk” was all the rage.

1980s: Power DressingHistory in Men's Style

In the 1980s things got a little more serious, with broad shoulders framing power ties and suspenders.

Bold colors and graphic patterns conveyed a new national confidence and businessmen took to power dressing with an emphasis on expensive clothing and gaudy accessories.

1990s: Baggy Business Casual History in Men's Style

This may be perhaps the worst-dressed decade of them all. The fashion in the 1990s was the genesis of a sweeping shift in the western world: the beginning of the adoption of tattoos and body piercings. 

This brought back the indifferent, anti-conformist approach to fashion, leading to the popularization of the casual chic look; this included T-shirts, distressed jeans, oversized hoodies, and trainers. “Business Casual” also enters the lexicon as corporate offices generally become less formal, ultimately causing the suit to get bigger and uglier than ever.

2000s: Hip-Hop & European TailoringHistory in Men's Style

Menswear in the new millennium was influenced primarily by hip-hop culture for the youth, and European “slim fit” tailoring for the older gents. The suit finally started to slim down, as the “European cut” became highly sought after in America, to the point where eventually it became hard to find stores that didn’t carry “slim fit”.

The internet also made it easier for men to learn about menswear and share their opinions with fellow style enthusiasts. We saw the birth of the first menswear blogs, with this one starting in 2009.

2010s: The Evolution Of Style Online: History in Men's Style

The 2010s have brought us the evolution of the “fashion star”. Fashion bloggers have become mainstream. On the one hand, suddenly fashion is in the hands of the people, producing a larger variety of styles, reviews, and opinions than ever before. On the other hand, those being watched are naturally encouraged to try harder and harder to stand out from the crowd. “Peacocking” became a menswear term in the early part of the decade for “trying too hard”, although men have generally become more confortable with subtle, tasteful styling. 

This period also marked the widespread acceptance of online shopping. Style enthusiasts from all over the world now have access to more brands than ever, from the convenience of their homes. The internet also allowed for more start-up brands than ever, marketed using social media and funded with online resources like kick-starter. In a way, we’re starting to see the re-surgence of the small brand, fueled by the power of the internet and the desire for consumers to have something limited and exclusive. The best part is, middle men are getting cut-out every day. Department stores, who’s business is marking-up goods that have already been marked-up by the wholesaler, are losing their stranglehold on the market as designers now have a scalable solution to sell their products directly to their consumers.

SEE ALSO: Inside The Brooklyn Factory That Makes Suits For America's Most Powerful Men

DON'T FORGET: Follow Business Insider's Life On Facebook!

Join the conversation about this story »


The Story Of The Last Piston-Engine Us Plane To Shoot Down An Enemy Fighter Jet

$
0
0

Skyraider 1966 Propeller Plane Vietnam

The last propeller US Navy attack aircraft to disappear from the decks of the flattops was the Douglas AD Skyraider.

This airplane had a unique capability: even when it carried its full internal fuel of 2,280 pounds, a 2,200-lb torpedo, two 2,000-lb bombs, 12 5-inch rockets, two 20 mm guns and 240 pounds of ammunition, the Skyraider was still under its maximum gross weight of 25,000 pounds.

Entered in service just in time to take part in the Korean War, the Skyraiders in the improved A-1H version were quite slow. The propeller-driven attack aircraft still managed to shoot down two MiG-17s during the early part of the Vietnam War.

In fact, some of the most unusual kills of the conflict did not come from the F-4s, F-105s, or F-8s, but from the Korean War-era piston-engine Skyraiders thanks to the plane's 4 M3 20mm fixed forward-firing cannons, capable of firing 800 rounds per minutes.

The first of these victorious engagements took place on Jun. 20, 1965, when a flight of Skyraiders from the Strike Squadron 25 (VA-25), the "Fist of the Fleet," took off from the USS Midway (CVA-41). They were supporting the rescue of a downed USAF pilot in the northwest corner of North Vietnam and were attacked by a flight of MiG-17s.

MiG 17 Vietnam circa 1972The two enemy jets launched missiles and fired with their cannons against the two A-1Hs. But both Skyraider pilots, Lt. Charles W. Hartman III, and Lt. Clinton B. Johnson, evaded them and maneuvered to shoot down one of the MiGs with their 20 mm cannons.

Lt. Johnson described this engagement in Donald J. McCarthy, Jr. book “MiG Killers: A Chronology of US Air Victories in Vietnam 1965-1973” as follows: “I fired a short burst at the MiG and missed, but got the MiG pilot’s attention. He turned into us, making a head-on pass. Charlie and I fired simultaneously as he passed so close that Charlie thought I had hit his vertical stabilizer with the tip of my tail hook. Both of us fired all four guns. Charlie’s rounds appeared to go down the intake and into the wing root, and mine along the top of the fuselage and through the canopy. He never returned our fire, rolled, inverted, and hit a small hill, exploding and burning in a farm field.”

The subsequent MiG kill of this engagement was shared by both Hartmann III and Johnson.

Douglas Skyraider flies over Carrier Midway 1972 Vietnam Gulf TonkinThe second victory of the propeller-driven Skyraider against a  North Vietnamese MiG-17 jet fighter took place on Oct. 9, 1966 and involved four A-1Hs launched from the deck of the USS Intrepid (CV-11) in the Gulf of Tonkin flying as “Papoose flight.”

The flight was from the Strike Squadron 176 (VA-176) Thunderbolts and it was led by Lt. Cdr. Leo Cook, with Lt. Wiley as wingman, while the second section was led by Lt. Peter Russell with Lt. William T. Patton as wingman.

It was during the RESCAP (the REScue Combat Air Patrol, a mission flown to protect the downed pilots from ground threats) flight, that the “Spads” (as the Skyraiders were dubbed by their pilots) were attacked by four MiG-17s. This engagement ended with one Fresco confirmed as being shot down, a second as probably shot down, and a third heavily damaged.

According to McCarthy, the MiG-17 kill was awarded to “Papoose 409,” the A-1H BuNo 137543, flown by Lt. Patton who, after having gained a position of advantage on one of the MiGs, opened fire with his four guns, hitting the tail section of the enemy jet. Patton followed the MiG which descended through the cloud deck and when Papoose 409 emerged from the clouds he spotted the enemy pilot’s parachute.

The US Navy Skyraiders last combat tour took place from July 1967 to 1968 onboard USS Coral Sea (CV-43). But this versatile propeller aircraft continued to fly with the US Air Force and with the Vietnamese Air Force until the end of the conflict thanks to its unparalleled capabilities in close air support.

SEE ALSO: Hagel wants to replace the B-2 with a new strategic bomber

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's The Definition Of Power From The Man Who's Studied It Most

$
0
0

robert greene

For almost 20 years, author Robert Greene has been studying what it means to be powerful.

His books "The 48 Laws of Power,""The Art of Seduction,""The 33 Strategies of War,""The 50th Law," and "Mastery" all explore how some of history's most famous — and infamous — figures managed to exert control over others and make their desires reality.

They're written like hyper-rational, Machiavellian guides to becoming successful, with the implication that while you may not become the next Napoleon, you could make your way up the corporate hierarchy using some of Bonaparte's favorite philosophies.

We asked Greene for his definition of "power." He said:

Power is the measure of the degree of control you have over circumstances in your life and the actions of the people around you. It is a skill that is developed by a deep understanding of human nature, of what truly motivates people, and of the manipulations necessary for advancement and protection. Power works best when it is indirect — never coercing people; instead, getting them to voluntarily align with your interests.

Ultimately, Greene describes power as having influence, over your environment and the people around you.

SEE ALSO: We Went To A Master Networker's Party With Bill Nye And Regina Spektor — And It Was Unlike Anything Else

Join the conversation about this story »

Archaeologists Find 1882 Rifle Leaning Against Nevada Desert Tree

$
0
0

Winchester rifleArchaeologists conducting a survey in Great Basin National Park in eastern Nevada have stumbled upon a 132-year-old Winchester rifle propped against a tree, possibly having been left there more than a century ago.

The rifle, which records show was manufactured and shipped by the gun maker in 1882, had been leaning against the Juniper tree for so long that the wood of its stock was cracked and deteriorated from the desert sun, its barrel rusted.

"It really is a mystery," said Nichole Andler, a public information officer for Great Basin National Park. "We know it has been out there awhile because the stock was buried in dirt. But we do not know for how exactly how long."

Andler said more than 700,000 Winchester Model 1783 rifles were manufactured by the company between 1873 and 1916, becoming known as the "gun that won the West" because of its popularity.

The remote, rugged area now encompassed by the park, in the high desert of eastern Nevada near the Utah border, was used primarily for mining and ranching at the time the rifle was sold.

Great Basin National Park was established there in 1986, known for its 5,000-year-old pine trees and other desert flora and fauna.

So far experts have not been able to establish who purchased the gun or where it has been in the 132 years since.

It was first spotted in November by a member of a park archaeology team surveying the area and Andler said it might have been overlooked in the past because the gray stock of the wood blended in with the tree.

Andler said the rifle would be conserved by experts to keep it from deteriorating any further but not be restored to newer-looking condition before it is put on display at the park.

(Editing by Will Dunham)

Join the conversation about this story »

Mark Zuckerberg's Second Book-Club Pick Is An 800-Page Historical Exploration Of Violence

$
0
0

zuckerberg book club entry 2

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg decided that in 2015, he'd read a book every two weeks and get the Facebook community involved as part of the discussion.

Anyone expecting a program akin to a techie's version of Oprah Winfrey's famed selections of literary classics and memoirs got a surprise with his first pick for "A Year in Books," the dense political study "The End of Power." His second selection is another heavy intellectual exploration.

Earlier this week, Zuckerberg announced his second pick is "The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined," an 830-page book by Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker. In a 2012 blog post, Bill Gates wrote it "stands out as one of the most important books I've read — not just this year, but ever."

Zuckerberg announced his pick on his personal Facebook page:

My second book of the year is The Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven Pinker.

It's a timely book about how and why violence has steadily decreased throughout our history, and how we can continue this trend.

Recent events might make it seem like violence and terrorism are more common than ever, so it's worth understanding that all violence — even terrorism — is actually decreasing over time. If we understand how we are achieving this, we can continue our path towards peace.

A few people I trust have told me this is the best book they've ever read. It's a long book, so I plan on taking a month to read it rather than two weeks. I'll add a third book in two weeks that will be a shorter read to complement this.

If you want to follow along with the books I'm reading and participate in conversations with the authors, you can like the page A Year of Books.

The week that Zuckerberg announced his first pick, "The End of Power," it sold out in paperback on Amazon. "The Better Angels of Our Nature" is already in Amazon's top 20 for books on the social sciences.

SEE ALSO: The First Book Mark Zuckerberg Chose For His Book Club Has Sold Out On Amazon

Join the conversation about this story »

Researchers Get Sloppy Recreating An Ancient Greek Drinking Game

$
0
0

Kottabos_Met_56.171.62

NEW ORLEANS — More than 2,000 years before the invention of beer pong, the ancient Greeks had a game called kottabos to pass the time at their drinking parties.

At Greek symposia, elite men, young and old, reclined on cushioned couches that lined the walls of the andron, the men's quarters of a household. They had lively conversations and recited poetry. They were entertained by dancers, flute girls and courtesans. They got drunk on wine, and in the name of competition, they hurled their dregs at a target in the center of the room to win prizes like eggs, pastries and sexual favors. Slaves cleaned up the mess.

"Trying to describe this ancient Greek drinking game, kottabos, to my students was always a little bit difficult because we do have these illustrations of it, but they only show one part of the game — where individuals are about to flick some dregs at a target," said Heather Sharpe, an associate professor of art history at West Chester University of Pennsylvania. [11 Interesting Facts About Hangovers]

"I thought it would be really great if we could actually try to do it ourselves," said Sharpe.

So, with a 3D-printed drinking cup, some diluted grape juice and a handful of willing students, Sharpe did just that. She found out that it wasn't impossible to get the hang of kottabos, but the game did require a skilled overhand toss. She presented her findings this past weekend (Jan. 8 to 11) here at the annual meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America.

Raise your glass

Ancient texts and works of art indicate that there were two ways to play kottabos. In one variation, the goal was to knock down a disc that was carefully balanced atop a tall metal stand in the middle of the room. In the other variation, there was no metal stand; rather, the goal was to sink small dishes floating in a larger bowl of water. In both versions, participants attempted to hit their target with the leftover wine at the bottom of their kylix, the ancient equivalent of a Solo cup.

The red-and-black kylixes had two looped handles and a shallow but wide body — a shape that perhaps was not the most practical for drinking but lent itself to playful decoration.

Big eyes were sometimes painted on the underside on kylixes so that the drinker would look like he was wearing a mask when he took a hefty sip. And the relatively flat, circular inside of the cup, called the tondo, often carried droll or risqué pictures that would be slowly revealed as the wine disappeared. The tondo of one kylix at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston bears the image of a man wiping his bottom. Another drinking cup at the same museum shows a man penetrating a woman from behind with the caption "Hold still."

Other paintings on kylixes were quite self-referential, with scenes of revelers playing kottabos. Based on those ancient illustrations, Sharpe had assumed that to play the game, you would swirl the dregs in the kylix and flick them at the target, almost as if you were doing a forehand throw with a Frisbee. But her experiment showed that that was not the most winning technique. [Coolest Archaeological Discoveries of 2014]

Re-enacting a symposium

kottabos cup.JPGSharpe collaborated with Andrew Snyder, a ceramics professor at West Chester University. He initially made three replica kylixes out of clay, but Sharpe was worried about breaking them during the game. Snyder had just acquired a 3D printer (a MakerBot Replicator 2), so they made a lighter, more durable, plastic kylix at a slightly smaller scale.

The team made mock-up kottabos targets to play both variations of the game. For their andron, Sharpe and her colleagues used one of the art department's drawing rooms (which had a linoleum floor for easy cleanup), and they grabbed a couple padded benches to serve as their couches. Instead of wine, they used watered-down grape juice.

To achieve the best results in kottabos, the participants had to loop a finger through one handle of the kylix and toss the juice overhand, as if they were pitching a baseball. Sharpe said that playing the game proved to be challenging, but she was amazed that some of her students started to hit the target within 10 to 15 minutes.

"It took a fair amount of control to actually direct the wine dregs, and interestingly enough, some of the women were the first to get it," Sharpe told Live Science. "In some respects, they relied a little bit more on finesse, whereas some of the guys were trying to throw it too hard."

Elite Greek women wouldn't have taken part in symposia, but there are some indications that the courtesans, called hetairai, would have played kottabos with the men.

"Another thing we quickly realized is, it must have gotten pretty messy," Sharpe said. "By the end of our experiment we had diluted grape juice all over the floor. In a typical symposium setting, in an andron, you would have had couches arranged on almost all four sides of the room, and if you missed the target, you were likely to splatter your fellow symposiast across the way. You'd imagine that, by the end of the symposium, you'd be drenched in wine, and your fellow symposiasts would be drenched in wine, too."

Sharpe would eventually like to attempt to play kottabos with real wine, to fully understand how the game would devolve as the participants got tipsy.

"It would be fun to actually experiment with wine drinking," Sharpe said. "Of course, this was a university event, so we couldn't exactly do it on campus. But really, to get the full experiment, it would be interesting to try it after having a kylix of wine, or after having two kylixes of wine."

Editor's note: This article was updated at 2:30 p.m. ET on Thursday to correct Heather Sharpe's title. She is an associate professor, not an assistant professor.

Follow Megan Gannon on Twitter. Follow us @livescience, Facebook& Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

SEE ALSO: People Who Work Long Hours Are More Likely To Drink Dangerously

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 1838 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>